| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 70.57 |
| Liaison | Kelsey Beal |
| Submission Date | Dec. 14, 2020 |
Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Jessica
Davis Director Office of Sustainability |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Internal reviewer: Amber Greaney (IUPUI Graduate Student)
Affiliation: IUPUI Graduate Student
Titles:
Sustainability Analyst Intern - IUPUI Sustainability
Peterson Fellow - IndyGo
President - O'Neill Graduate Student Association
External reviewers: Andrew Predmore and Geory Kurtzhals
Affiliation: Staff, IU Office of Sustainability (SustainIU)
Titles:
Andrew Predmore, Director, SustainIU
Geory Kurtzhals, Sustainability Analyst, SustainIU
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Amber was provided full access to the STARS platform + reviewer sheet. She reviewed each credit for accuracy and completion, tracked notes in the reviewer sheet, and then met with the IUPUI Sustainability reporting team to walk through each item. After each area of concern was corrected, Amber noted such in her tracking document.
Andrew and Geory were provided observer access to STARS. They reviewed each credit and provided commentary via email. IUPUI Sustainability reporting team met, discussed feedback, and made corrections where appropriate.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.