| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 72.14 |
| Liaison | Kelsey Beal |
| Submission Date | March 2, 2018 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Indiana University Bloomington
OP-17: Employee Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.55 / 2.00 |
Kevin
Whited Transportation Demand Manager Budgetary Administration and Planning |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total percentage of the institution’s employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary method of transportation:
27.30
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting, including the timeframe for when the analysis was conducted and how a representative sample was reached, if applicable:
An extensive employee and student transportation survey was conducted in the fall of 2017, in collaboration with Indiana University Bloomington Center for Survey Research. All faculty and staff received the survey, and the response rate was high.
The survey focused on three areas for gathering commuting information; how employees and students who live off-campus currently commute to campus; how aware are employees and off-campus students of currently offered Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs; and what TDM programs and campus transportation infrastructure improvements would encourage more use of alternative modes for commuting to IUB.
Optional Fields
| Percentage (0-100) | |
| Commute with only the driver in the vehicle (excluding motorcycles and scooters) | 72.70 |
| Walk, bicycle, or use other non-motorized means | 12.20 |
| Vanpool or carpool | 8.50 |
| Take a campus shuttle or public transportation | 4.30 |
| Use a motorcycle, scooter or moped | 0.60 |
| Telecommute for 50 percent or more of their regular work hours | 1.70 |
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.