Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 76.57 |
Liaison | Katie Koscielak |
Submission Date | April 11, 2023 |
Cal Poly Humboldt
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Katie
Koscielak Sustainability Analyst Facilities Mgmt |
Please note that assured reports are still subject to review by AASHE staff prior to publication, which may require additional revisions. AASHE reserves the right to withhold points for this credit if it is determined that the assurance process was clearly unsuccessful in identifying and resolving inconsistencies or errors (e.g., when AASHE staff identify a significant number of issues that were either not mentioned in the completed review template or not resolved successfully).
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
The members of the Channel Islands that worked on this review were:
-Roxane Beigel-Coryell, Sustainability staff
-Nikita Sarmiento, student assistant
In addition, the Humboldt Office of Sustainability outsourced an internal review of our report to a student team of reviewers. Contributors included:
-Emily Read, graduate student
-Zeen Vincent, undergraduate student
-Hannah Lacey, undergraduate student
-Amber Chung, undergraduate student
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Remaining issues include:
>>Channel Islands: AC 1 - reviewer commented that 3 courses do not show sufficient data to suggest they are sustainability related
>>internal student review team - no outstanding issues. Reviewers did not review PRE credits
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Optional
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.