Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 79.01
Liaison Lindsay Walker
Submission Date Feb. 14, 2023

STARS v2.2

Humber College
OP-5: Building Energy Efficiency

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 5.50 / 6.00 Spencer Wood
Associate Director, Maintenance and Operations
Facilities Management
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Part 1. Site energy use per unit of floor area

Performance year energy consumption

Electricity use, performance year (report kilowatt-hours):
kWh MMBtu
Imported electricity 23,507,169 Kilowatt-hours 80,206.46 MMBtu
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) 1,054,414 Kilowatt-hours 3,597.66 MMBtu

Stationary fuels and thermal energy, performance year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy 99,316 MMBtu
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water 0 MMBtu

Total site energy consumption, performance year:
183,120.12 MMBtu

Performance year building space

Gross floor area of building space, performance year:
281,113.39 Gross square meters

Floor area of energy intensive space, performance year:
Floor area
Laboratory space 13,415.99 Square meters
Healthcare space 0 Square meters
Other energy intensive space 14,009.16 Square meters

EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
321,954.39 Gross square meters

Performance year heating and cooling degree days 

Degree days, performance year:
Degree days
Heating degree days 3,566 Degree-Days (°C)
Cooling degree days 551 Degree-Days (°C)

Total degree days, performance year:
4,117 Degree-Days (°C)

Performance period

Start and end dates of the performance year (or 3-year period):
Start date End date
Performance period April 1, 2021 March 31, 2022

Metric used in scoring for Part 1

Total site energy consumption per unit of EUI-adjusted floor area per degree day, performance year:
42.64 Btu / GSM / Degree-Day (°C)

Part 2. Reduction in source energy use per unit of floor area

Baseline year energy consumption

STARS 2.2 requires electricity data in kilowatt-hours (kWh). If a baseline has already been established in a previous version of STARS and the institution wishes to continue using it, the electricity data must be re-entered in kWh. To convert existing electricity figures from MMBtu to kWh, simply multiply by 293.07107 MMBtu/kWh.

Electricity use, baseline year (report kWh):
kWh MMBtu
Imported electricity 27,414,160 Kilowatt-hours 93,537.11 MMBtu
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) 0 Kilowatt-hours 0 MMBtu

Stationary fuels and thermal energy, baseline year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy 114,327 MMBtu
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water 0 MMBtu

Total site energy consumption, baseline year:
207,864.11 MMBtu

Baseline year building space

Gross floor area of building space, baseline year:
185,924.82 Gross square meters

Baseline period

Start and end dates of the baseline year (or 3-year period):
Start date End date
Baseline period Jan. 1, 2005 Dec. 31, 2005

A brief description of when and why the energy consumption baseline was adopted:
---

Source energy

Source-site ratio for imported electricity:
2

Total energy consumption per unit of floor area:
Site energy Source energy
Performance year 0.65 MMBtu per square meter 0.94 MMBtu per square meter
Baseline year 1.12 MMBtu per square meter 1.62 MMBtu per square meter

Metric used in scoring for Part 2

Percentage reduction in total source energy consumption per unit of floor area from baseline:
42.22

Optional Fields 

Documentation to support the performance year energy consumption figures reported above:
---

A brief description of the institution's initiatives to shift individual attitudes and practices in regard to energy efficiency:
A page is dedicated on the Office of Sustainability's website to energy saving tips at school, work and home. The energy awareness campaign was heavily promoted on social media.

As part and parcel of our sustainability initiatives, and in support of Canada’s commitment to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, Humber has recognized the importance of examining energy and water consumption more strategically and in 2015 authorized the development of an Integrated Energy Master Plan (IEMP) looking forward to 2034. The IEMP team is being challenged to create a plan that meets the following goals for Humber College:
- Offer world-class courses addressing competitive and integrated energy, water and climate solutions while acting as a living laboratory for our students
- Create a campus-wide energy culture by engaging both staff and students via education/events
- Reduce energy use by 50% per square foot by 2034
- Reduce water use by 50% per student by 2034
- Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 30% by 2034

A brief description of energy use standards and controls employed by the institution:
---

A brief description of Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting and other energy-efficient lighting strategies employed by the institution:
Humber developed aggressive lighting standards. Our lighting retrofit projects go further than a simple one for one LED retrofit to include full lighting redesign to reduce the number of fixtures, aggressive lighting energy density targets, and a standardized network lighting control system. We have been seeing energy savings above 60% from our T8 system.

A brief description of passive solar heating, geothermal systems, and related strategies employed by the institution:
Humber is currently installing a large geothermal field as part of a large new construction project at our Lakeshore Campus. With 100 geothermal wells over 800 feet deep, it is how the building will achieve net zero carbon status. At our North Campus we have conducted a geothermal survey to identify the resource, and have designed our new district energy project to be able to take a geothermal field as part of a future project.

A brief description of co-generation employed by the institution:
After much consideration Humber has decided not to install a cogeneration system. The Ontario electrical grid is so clean that a cogen will drive carbon emissions on campus much higher than they are now. Instead we are implementing a load shedding strategy to replace the financial payback of the cogen.

A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace energy-consuming appliances, equipment, and systems with high efficiency alternatives:
Humber has set efficiency standards for new equipment, and always incorporates efficiency in the replacement decision process. It is a part of our Integrated Energy Master Plan.

Website URL where information about the institution’s energy conservation and efficiency program is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The discrepancy between the performance and baseline year is due to the energy efficiency programs implemented at the college in recent years, along with the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. A smaller amount of energy was consumed on campus during the reporting time period due to the stay-at-home orders, and this is reflected in the data.

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.