| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 54.84 |
| Liaison | Lisa Lonie |
| Submission Date | June 29, 2020 |
Haverford College
PA-3: Inclusive and Participatory Governance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.50 / 3.00 |
Jesse
Lytle VP and Chief of Staff Office of the President |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Shared governance bodies
| Yes or No | |
| Students | Yes |
| Academic staff | Yes |
| Non-academic staff | Yes |
A brief description of the institution’s formal participatory or shared governance bodies:
Students' Council: students at Haverford have a high degree of agency. Student self-governance manifests itself in different ways. Students' Council works with administrators, Board members, and faculty members throughout the year, advocating for the interests and needs of students. Students' Council is responsible for allocating money each semester to the 150 different clubs and organizations that go through the budgeting process. It is also responsible for appointing members to the many different committees on Haverford's campus that deal with different aspects of student life.
Faculty elect their own leadership across key faculty governance committees (FAPC, EPC, AAC -- see below website) that govern the academic program and contribute to broader institutional governance.
The Staff Association Executive Committee is populated through election by staff themselves.
Governing board: Students elect peers to serve as representatives to the board of managers, staff elect staff through the Staff Association Executive Committee to serve as representatives to the board of managers, faculty also elect representatives to the board of managers.
Faculty elect their own leadership across key faculty governance committees (FAPC, EPC, AAC -- see below website) that govern the academic program and contribute to broader institutional governance.
The Staff Association Executive Committee is populated through election by staff themselves.
Governing board: Students elect peers to serve as representatives to the board of managers, staff elect staff through the Staff Association Executive Committee to serve as representatives to the board of managers, faculty also elect representatives to the board of managers.
Part 2. Campus stakeholder representation in governance
32
Number of students representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:
0
Number of academic staff representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:
0
Number of non-academic staff representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:
0
Part 3. Gender equity in governance
14
Percentage of official members of the highest governing body that are women:
43.75
Website URL where information about the institution’s highest governing body may be found:
Part 4. Community engagement bodies
No
A brief description of the campus-community council or equivalent body that gives external stakeholders a regular voice in institutional decisions that affect them:
---
Optional Fields
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s governance structure is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.