| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 49.24 |
| Liaison | Lisa Lonie |
| Submission Date | June 11, 2014 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Haverford College
OP-14: Office Paper Purchasing
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.81 / 1.00 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution have an institution-wide stated preference to purchase office paper that has recycled content and/or is certified to meet multi-criteria sustainability standards for paper?:
Yes
None
A copy of the paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
---
None
The paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
Yes, we use 30% recycled envirocopy paper. It is made with 30% post consumer recycled content and non-recycled content from FSC (Forest Stewardship Council) certified forests. We are a decentralized purchasing office, therefore, we do not give specific directives in terms of purchasing. We highly recommend to all purchasing the recycled paper and the majority of the community across campus does purchase it.
None
A brief description of steps the institution has taken to ensure that the purchasing policy, directives, or guidelines are followed :
The purchasing office approves all the office supplies orders made from Office Depot. Internally the purchasing office's policy is to contact the requester to change their purchase to recycled paper.
None
Does the institution wish to pursue Part 2 of this credit (expenditures on office paper)?:
Yes
None
Expenditures on office paper with the following levels of post-consumer recycled, agricultural residue, and/or FSC certified content::
| Expenditure Per Level | |
| 10-29 percent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
| 30-49 percent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
| 50-69 percent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
| 70-89 percent (or FSC Mix label) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
| 90-100 percent (or FSC Recycled label) | 28,378 US/Canadian $ |
None
Total expenditures on office paper :
37,809
US/Canadian $
None
The website URL where information about the paper purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.