| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 68.23 |
| Liaison | Josh Lasky |
| Submission Date | March 5, 2020 |
George Washington University
OP-3: Building Design and Construction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.58 / 3.00 |
Meghan
Chapple Director & Senior Advisor Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total floor area of newly constructed or renovated building space:
3,270,772
Square feet
Floor area of eligible building space designed and built in accordance with published green building codes, policies, and/or rating systems:
| Floor area | |
| Certified at the highest achievable level under a multi-attribute GBC rating system for design and construction (e.g., LEED BD+C Platinum or Certified Living Building) | 0 Square feet |
| Certified at the 2nd highest level under a 4- or 5-tier, multi-attribute GBC rating system for design and construction (e.g., LEED BD+C Gold) | 828,827 Square feet |
| Certified at mid-level under a 3- or 5-tier, multi-attribute GBC rating system for design and construction (e.g., BREEAM Very Good) | 0 Square feet |
| Certified at a step above minimum level under ar 4- or 5-tier, multi-attribute GBC rating system for design and construction (e.g., LEED BD+C Silver) | 51,261 Square feet |
| Certified at minimum level under a multi-attribute GBC rating system for design and construction (e.g., LEED BD+C Certified) | 0 Square feet |
| Certified/verified at any level under a multi-attribute, non-GBC rating system for design and construction, a green building code, or a single-attribute rating system for design and construction | 0 Square feet |
| Designed and built in accordance with a multi-attribute green building code, policy, guideline, or rating system, but not certified/verified | 2,390,684 Square feet |
| Designed and built in accordance with a single-attribute green building code, policy, guideline, or rating system, but not certified/verified | 0 Square feet |
| Total | 3,270,772 Square feet |
Percentage of newly constructed or renovated building space certified under a green building rating system for design and construction:
26.91
A list of new construction and major renovation projects that indicates the green building code, policy/guideline, or rating system that applies to each building:
1 South Hall 2010 NC GOLD 214,346
2 West Hall 2010 NC GOLD 139,591
3 Lafayette Hall 2012 NC GOLD 36,035
4 Smith Center 2012 NC GOLD 129,302
5 Ames Hall 2012 NC GOLD 55,713
6 2013 H ST NW 2013 NC GOLD 33,884
7 Law Clinic 2014 NC GOLD 27,651
8 Museum Conservation Center 2014 NC SILVER 55,050
9 LLC and G St Garage 2014 NC SILVER 37,658
10 School of Public Health 2014 NC PLATINUM 130,807
11 GW Museum 2014 NC GOLD 50,394
12 Science and Engineering Hall 2015 NC GOLD 431,717
13 District House Residence Hall 2017 NC GOLD 319,460
14 Ross Hall 2014 CI GOLD 34,930
15 Science and Engineering Hall - 7&8 Floors 2016 CI GOLD 77,650
16 1922 F St 2019 CI SILVER 51,261
17 Corcoran Hall 2018 CI GOLD 53,013
2 West Hall 2010 NC GOLD 139,591
3 Lafayette Hall 2012 NC GOLD 36,035
4 Smith Center 2012 NC GOLD 129,302
5 Ames Hall 2012 NC GOLD 55,713
6 2013 H ST NW 2013 NC GOLD 33,884
7 Law Clinic 2014 NC GOLD 27,651
8 Museum Conservation Center 2014 NC SILVER 55,050
9 LLC and G St Garage 2014 NC SILVER 37,658
10 School of Public Health 2014 NC PLATINUM 130,807
11 GW Museum 2014 NC GOLD 50,394
12 Science and Engineering Hall 2015 NC GOLD 431,717
13 District House Residence Hall 2017 NC GOLD 319,460
14 Ross Hall 2014 CI GOLD 34,930
15 Science and Engineering Hall - 7&8 Floors 2016 CI GOLD 77,650
16 1922 F St 2019 CI SILVER 51,261
17 Corcoran Hall 2018 CI GOLD 53,013
An inventory of new construction and major renovation projects that indicates the green building code, policy/guideline, or rating system that applies to each building:
---
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
In 2012, as part of the Sustainable DC Plan to make the District of Columbia a nationwide leader in sustainability, Mayor Vincent C. Gray issued a directive to the District’s Construction Codes Coordinating Board (CCCB)
to review, amend and adopt the model 2012 International Codes as published by the International Code Council (ICC). On March 28, 2014, the District officially adopted the 2013 District of Columbia Construction
Codes, comprised of the 2012 International Codes and the 2013 DC Construction Codes Supplement. Included in the 2013 DC Construction Codes are the District of Columbia Green Construction Code (GCC) and Energy Conservation Code (ECC), comprised of the 2012 IgCC and IECC, as modified by the 2013 Construction Codes Supplements (12 DCMR K and 12 DCMR I). These codes incorporate many local sustainable, energy- and water efficient building best practices as mandatory requirements, giving the District one of the greenest construction codes in the country. The codes also extend the green building practices legislated by the District of Columbia Green Building Act of 2006 (GBA).
https://dcra.dc.gov/page/green-building-compliance
to review, amend and adopt the model 2012 International Codes as published by the International Code Council (ICC). On March 28, 2014, the District officially adopted the 2013 District of Columbia Construction
Codes, comprised of the 2012 International Codes and the 2013 DC Construction Codes Supplement. Included in the 2013 DC Construction Codes are the District of Columbia Green Construction Code (GCC) and Energy Conservation Code (ECC), comprised of the 2012 IgCC and IECC, as modified by the 2013 Construction Codes Supplements (12 DCMR K and 12 DCMR I). These codes incorporate many local sustainable, energy- and water efficient building best practices as mandatory requirements, giving the District one of the greenest construction codes in the country. The codes also extend the green building practices legislated by the District of Columbia Green Building Act of 2006 (GBA).
https://dcra.dc.gov/page/green-building-compliance
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.