Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 69.74
Liaison Laura Bain
Submission Date Oct. 9, 2024

STARS v3.0

Furman University
OP-14: Commute Modal Split

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 3.61 / 6.00 Laura Bain
Associate Director of Sustainability Assessment
David E. Shi Center for Sustainability
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

14.1 Percentage of students and employees using more sustainable commuting options

Performance year for commute modal split:
2024

Full-time equivalent student enrollment:
2,514

Full-time equivalent of employees:
938

Has the institution gathered data about student commuting behavior?:
Yes

Percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options:
80.90

Description of the methodology used to gather data about student commuting:

The entire student body was surveyed about their commuting habits. The assessment was administered as part of Furman’s Sustainability Survey which has been administered to students, faculty, and staff, every third year since 2008. The 2024 survey was administered through the Qualtrics survey platform and distributed via an individual e-mail. Each participant was asked where they live and/or how far their residence is from campus. Then, each participant was asked how many trips by each mode of transportation were made in a typical week. Data were analyzed to determine: % of total trips by mode, average # of 1-way trips/week, average miles per one-way trip by mode, % of commuters that use a sustainable option as their primary (most frequent) mode of transportation.


Has the institution gathered data about employee commuting behavior?:
Yes

Percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options:
4.62

Description of the methodology used to gather data about employee commuting:

All employees were surveyed about their commuting habits. The assessment was administered as part of Furman’s Sustainability Survey which has been administered to students, faculty, and staff, every third year since 2008. The 2024 survey was administered through the Qualtrics survey platform and distributed via an individual e-mail. Each participant was asked where they live and/or how far their residence is from campus. Then, each participant was asked how many trips by each mode of transportation were made in a typical week. Data were analyzed to determine: % of total trips by mode, average # of 1-way trips/week, average miles per one-way trip by mode, % of commuters that use a sustainable option as their primary (most frequent) mode of transportation. 


The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator OP 14.1:
3.61

Optional documentation

Notes about the information provided for this credit:
---

Additional documentation for this credit:
---

Student commuting data

The following 10 fields are included to provide additional context for interpreting the institution’s student modal split. Report either the percentage of students that use each option as their primary means of transportation or the percentage of trips for which students use each option (or avoided trips in the case of remote learning). The figures should total 100.

Percentage of students that commute using single-occupancy car, van, or truck:
---

Percentage of students that commute by walking or the equivalent:
---

Percentage of students that commute by cycling or another micro-mobility option:
---

Percentage of students that commute by carpool or vanpool:
---

Percentage of students that commute by bus, shuttle, or ferry:
---

Percentage of students that commute by rail:
---

Percentage of students that commute by light rail or tram:
---

Percentage of students that commute by motorcycle or moped:
---

Percentage of students that commute by zero emission vehicle:
---

Percentage of students that avail of remote learning:
---

Employee commuting data

The following 10 fields are included to provide additional context for interpreting the institution’s employee modal split. Report either the percentage of employees that use each option as their primary means of transportation or the percentage of trips for which employees use each option (or avoided trips in the case of remote work). The figures should total 100.

Percentage of employees that commute using single-occupancy car, van, or truck:
---

Percentage of employees that commute by walking or the equivalent:
---

Percentage of employees that commute by cycling or another micro-mobility option:
---

Percentage of employees that commute by carpool or vanpool:
---

Percentage of employees that commute by bus, shuttle, or ferry:
---

Percentage of employees that commute by rail:
---

Percentage of employees that commute by light rail or tram:
---

Percentage of employees that commute by motorcycle or moped:
---

Percentage of employees that commute by zero emission vehicle:
---

Percentage of employees that avail of remote work:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.