Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 36.28 |
Liaison | Claire Rodgers |
Submission Date | June 28, 2018 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering
OP-19: Waste Minimization and Diversion
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.72 / 8.00 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Parts 1 and 2: Waste Minimization
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Materials recycled | 32.30 Tons | 30.89 Tons |
Materials composted | 0 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials donated or re-sold | 0.08 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion | 0 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator | 179 Tons | 185 Tons |
Total waste generated | 211.38 Tons | 215.89 Tons |
If reporting post-recycling residual conversion, provide:
---
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Year | July 1, 2016 | June 30, 2017 |
Baseline Year | July 1, 2015 | June 30, 2016 |
If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:
---
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 355 | 354 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 4 | 4 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site and/or staffed hospital beds | 5 | 6 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 366 | 382 |
Full-time equivalent of employees (staff + faculty) | 129 | 125 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 0 | 0 |
Weighted campus users | 466 | 475.75 |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user | 0.45 Tons | 0.45 Tons |
Percentage reduction in total waste generated per weighted campus user from baseline:
0.04
Part 3: Waste Diversion
15.32
Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator (including up to 10 percent attributable to post-recycling residual conversion):
15.32
In the waste figures reported above, has the institution recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold the following materials?:
Yes or No | |
Paper, plastics, glass, metals, and other recyclable containers | Yes |
Food | No |
Cooking oil | No |
Plant materials | No |
Animal bedding | No |
White goods (i.e. appliances) | Yes |
Laboratory equipment | No |
Furniture | Yes |
Residence hall move-in/move-out waste | Yes |
Scrap metal | Yes |
Pallets | Yes |
Tires | No |
Other (please specify below) | No |
A brief description of other materials the institution has recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold:
Even though the institution has donated items to a green initiatives group Grad Bag, the tonnage of these donations was not recorded it was estimated.
Optional Fields
Active Recovery and Reuse
---
Recycling Management
Yes
Does the institution use dual stream (two separate containers for recyclables, e.g. one for paper and another for plastic, glass, and metals) to collect standard recyclables (i.e. paper, plastic, glass, metals) in common areas?:
No
Does the institution use multi-stream recycling (multiple containers that further separate different types of materials) to collect standard recyclables (i.e. paper, plastic, glass, metals) in common areas?:
No
Contamination and Discard Rates
---
A brief description of any recycling quality control mechanisms employed, e.g. efforts to minimize contamination and/or monitor the discard rates of the materials recovery facilities and mills to which materials are diverted:
---
Programs and Initiatives
We compete in RecycleMania every year.
A brief description of the institution's waste audits and other initiatives to assess its materials management efforts and identify areas for improvement:
Our vendor, Wellesley Trucking, randomly audits at the point of disposal with Covanta. We are 100% trash to energy (incineration). If we have too much recycling in our waste, we get notified and fined if we are repeat offenders.
A brief description of the institution's procurement policies designed to prevent waste (e.g. by minimizing packaging and purchasing in bulk):
There is no written policy, but it is kept in consideration when purchasing is made.
A brief description of the institution's surplus department or formal office supplies exchange program that facilitates reuse of materials:
---
A brief description of the institution's platforms to encourage peer-to-peer exchange and reuse (e.g. of electronics, furnishings, books and other goods):
There are also "freecycle" bins, which students use to donate and swap goods, such as cups, toys, clothes.
A brief description of the institution's limits on paper and ink consumption (e.g. restricting free printing and/or mandating doubled-sided printing in libraries and computer labs):
---
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to make materials (e.g. course catalogs, course schedules, and directories) available online by default rather than printing them:
All course schedules and catalogs are online. Registration is also online. Most documents used by students, excepting financial aid and documents that require signatures, are available online to students through the Olin Portal (my.olin.edu). This automates document management as well decreasing paper consumption.
A brief description of the institution's program to reduce residence hall move-in/move-out waste:
A lot of the move-out waste was donated to the local green initiatives group Grad Bag, which supplies a non profit with used dorm supplies for low income college first years. Additional supplies were donated to Staples (binders) and Habitat for Humanity (furniture).
A brief description of the institution's programs or initiatives to recover and reuse other materials intended for disposal:
There are large bins to donate books and clothes in the resident halls. Extra books are donated to the Needham library and clothes get donated to the Needham Transfer Station donation trailer.
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Recycling data is based off of the average weight of the single stream recycling (measurements taken weekly) and extrapolated for a year (including a reduced amount during the summer). Cardboard data was provided by the vendor. Trash data is on the invoices and Needham Transfer Station recycling weights are on the invoices.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.