Overall Rating Gold - expired
Overall Score 65.25
Liaison Amanda Whittingham
Submission Date Nov. 30, 2018
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.1

Fanshawe College
AC-11: Open Access to Research

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 2.00 Dan Douglas
Dean
Centre for Research and Innovation
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

How many of the institution’s research-producing divisions are covered by a published open access policy that ensures that versions of future scholarly articles by faculty and staff are deposited in a designated open access repository? (All, Some or None):
Some

Which of the following best describes the open access policy? (Mandatory or Voluntary):
Mandatory (or mandatory with a waiver option)

Does the institution provide financial incentives to support faculty members with article processing and other open access publication charges?:
Yes

A brief description of the open access policy, including the date adopted, any incentives or supports provided, and the repository(ies) used:
The open access policy is both mandatory and voluntary, depending on whether the project is Tri-Agency funded or not. Any research publications that utilize Tri-Agency funding must be open access per Tri-Agency guidelines. The Knowledge dissemination portion of internal grants would support open access publishing

A copy of the institution's open access policy:
The institution's open access policy:
---

None
The website URL where the open access repository is available:

Optional Fields 

Estimated percentage of scholarly articles published annually by the institution’s faculty and staff that are deposited in a designated open access repository (0-100):
---

A brief description of how the institution’s library(ies) support open access to research:
Yes, Fanshawe complies with the tri-council’s policy on open access through hosting an open access institutional repository (FIRST). - Karla Van Kessel Director, Library and Media Services, Student Services

The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.