Overall Rating Silver - expired
Overall Score 61.30
Liaison Scott Morgan
Submission Date Aug. 30, 2019
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.1

Evergreen State College, The
OP-16: Student Commute Modal Split

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.16 / 2.00 Sam Alfieri
Sustainability Analyst
Office of Sustainability
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Total percentage of students (graduate and undergraduate) that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary means of transportation:

A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting, including the timeframe for when the analysis was conducted and how a representative sample was reached, if applicable:

TESC students were surveyed in Spring of 2017 about their commutes and other habits. All students from all campuses were included in this survey. Graduate students were not included in this sample. A random sample of 1,200 undergraduate from all four campuses was selected and the sample was ordered by the class standing. Samples were taken from different classes to be more representative of the population. One-thousand seven-hundred and thirty seven undergraduates were invited and seven hundred fifty-one additional students were surveyed. Students were contacted by email or letter to take the survey.

The percentage of students that use each of the following modes as their primary means of transportation to get to and from campus::
Percentage (0-100)
Commute with only the driver in the vehicle (excluding motorcycles and scooters) 46
Walk, bicycle, or use other non-motorized means 8
Vanpool or carpool 20
Take a campus shuttle or public transportation 21
Use a motorcycle, scooter or moped ---

The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:

Students were able to select more than one option in the Student Experience Survey when describing their typical means of commute, so results do not add up to 100%.

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.