| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 63.54 |
| Liaison | Carly Thibodeau |
| Submission Date | Aug. 8, 2019 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Endicott College
OP-6: Clean and Renewable Energy
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.00 / 4.00 |
Anthony
Michetti Director of Sustainability Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total energy consumption (all sources, excluding transportation fuels), performance year :
86,957
MMBtu
Option 1
0
MMBtu
None
A brief description of on-site renewable electricity generating devices :
WE DO NOT RETAIN ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTES, BUT:
This scoring should be revisited as institutions located in Massachusetts can no longer retain environmental attributes under the state's new solar incentive program (SMART Program) for onsite solar PV projects. The utilities retain all environmental attributes.
It is not financially feasible for an institution Endicott's size to install the over 1MW of solar PV we have on campus without our state incentive programs.
Option 2
0
MMBtu
None
A brief description of on-site renewable non-electric energy devices:
---
Option 3
0
MMBtu
None
A brief description of off-site, institution-catalyzed, renewable electricity generating devices:
---
Option 4
0
MMBtu
A brief description of the RECs, GOs and/or similar renewable energy products, including contract timeframes:
---
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Sierra magazine requests the following information from U.S. institutions that wish to share data with that organization:
| Percentage of total electricity use (0-100) | |
| Biomass | 0 |
| Coal | 6 |
| Geothermal | 0 |
| Hydro | 7 |
| Natural gas | 44 |
| Nuclear | 36 |
| Solar photovoltaic | 4 |
| Wind | 4 |
| Other (please specify and explain below) | --- |
A brief description of other sources of electricity not specified above:
Based on ISO New England report.
ISO reports 8% other renewable. Here we have spit that between wind and solar.
Endicott hosts a large Solar PV array, but does not keep the SRECs.
Energy used for heating buildings, by source::
| Percentage of total energy used to heat buildings (0-100) | |
| Biomass | 0 |
| Coal | 0 |
| Electricity | 0 |
| Fuel oil | 10 |
| Geothermal | 0 |
| Natural gas | 90 |
| Other (please specify and explain below) | 0 |
A brief description of other sources of building heating not specified above:
---
Percentage of total energy consumption from clean and renewable sources:
0
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
WE DO NOT RETAIN ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTES FOR OUR SOLAR PV, BUT:
This scoring should be revisited as institutions located in Massachusetts can no longer retain environmental attributes for onsite solar PV projects under the state's new solar incentive program (SMART Program). The local utilities retain all environmental attributes.
It is not financially feasible for an institution Endicott's size to install the over 1MW of solar PV we have on campus without our state incentive programs. Our projects support the renewable energy market and increase visibility while generating clean energy that is used onsite.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.