Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 74.46 |
Liaison | Ciannat Howett |
Submission Date | Oct. 9, 2024 |
Emory University
AC-9: Research and Scholarship
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
3.01 / 12.00 |
Cyrus
Bhedwar Director Office of Sustainability Initiatives |
Part 1. Sustainability research
Number of employees engaged in sustainability research:
Percentage of employees that conduct research that are engaged in sustainability research:
Part 2. Sustainability research by department
Number of academic departments that include at least one employee who conducts sustainability research:
Percentage of departments that conduct research that are engaged in sustainability research:
Research Inventory
Inventory of the institution’s sustainability research:
A brief description of the methodology the institution followed to complete the research inventory:
This year, Emory reused its methodology from our past report but made changes to how courses were categorized based on the best judgment of staff. Our methodology was to create a list of keywords made up of AASHE-recommended keywords and phrases that centered on UN SDG references. We used this same keyword list as the first step to inventorying the courses for AC-1, the research for AC-9, and the continuing education courses for EN-12. Emory Sustainability staff reviewed all of the research descriptions and identified whether or not they were sustainability-focused or sustainability-inclusive, and eliminated those that were neither. We used the long research descriptions to conduct this review.
As a public health-focused research institution, a common SDG combination was SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being and SDG 10: Reduce Inequalities. We believe this research contributes significantly to advancing sustainability by actively addressing racial or historical disparities, often associated with environmental health issues or institutional discrimination (SDG 16).
We also feel we have undercounted the total number of research projects addressing sustainability because of incomplete or unavailable information. Many titles suggested a strong sustainability element, but we could not provide substantial references to support our hypothesis and accordingly did not include these.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
All data reported in this section for September 2021-August 2023
The spreadsheet includes the following columns:
Fiscal Year: the fiscal year of the award
PI Name
Operating Unit: School in which the PI operates
Department: Program or major in which the PI operates
Title: Award title
Description: Award description. In some cases links to additional information have been provided in the cases where the description itself may not be considered sufficiently detailed to evaluate.
Justification: the SDG or SDGs addressed by the research award.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.