Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 66.74 |
Liaison | Jennifer Lamy |
Submission Date | March 30, 2018 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Emerson College
IN-18: Pre-Submission Review
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.50 / 0.50 |
Amy
Elvidge Sustainability Coordinator Campus Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Elizabeth Tomaszewski, FacilitiesSystems Manager, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
A brief description of the review process:
Emerson participated in the 2018 STARS Review Pilot. Emerson's STARS submission received an external review from Elizabeth Tomaszewski from WPI. Elizabeth is the primary data collector for WPI's STARS submission and my mentor through the AASHE peer mentor program.
Elizabeth was added as an "Observer" under the Users tab. Elizabeth viewed the information saved in credits and completed a google spreadsheet addressing different aspects of Emerson's submission.
Which of the following describes the review process?:
Independent reviewer(s)
Affirmation from the reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from an additional reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
---
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 2nd reviewer:
---
Affirmation from a 3rd reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
---
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 3rd reviewer:
---
Affirmation from a 4th reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
---
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 4th reviewer:
---
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.