Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 65.28 |
Liaison | Ciara Tennis |
Submission Date | Nov. 3, 2022 |
Eastern Connecticut State University
OP-11: Sustainable Procurement
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.75 / 3.00 |
Part 1. Institution-wide sustainable procurement policies
A copy of the policies, guidelines or directives:
The policies, guidelines or directives:
The state set-aside program requires state agencies and political subdivisions
(other than municipalities, under prior law) to set aside 25% of the total value of all contracts they let for construction, goods, and services each year for exclusive bidding by certified small contractors. The agencies must further reserve 25% of the set-aside value (6.25% of the total) for exclusive bidding by certified minority business enterprises (MBE). The act requires contractors awarded “municipal public works contracts” to comply with these requirements if the (1) contract includes state financial assistance and (2) total contract value exceeds $50,000. The set aside amount is based on the value of the state’s financial assistance for the contract (i.e., at least 25% of the amount of state assistance must be set aside for small contractors, and at least 6.25% must be reserved for MBEs, respectively). More can be found at https://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/chap_058.htm#sec_4a-60g
Part 2. Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Which of the following best describes the institution’s use of LCCA?:
A brief description of the LCCA policy and/or practices:
DAS does LCCA on building projects (energy and water) (see "01900_LifeCycleActivities": https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&cx=004354853108091474482:sp6telu2lxi&q=https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/DAS/Construction-Services/DAS-CS-Library/5000-Series/5300---DB/019000_LifeCycleActivities_DB.docx&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiL-oOXyOH0AhWWrHIEHVQvACAQFnoECAYQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2FLUIlANDMknG4xn-aYovF)
Part 3. Product-specific sustainability criteria
To count, the criteria must address the specific sustainability challenges and impacts associated with products and/or services in each category, e.g. by requiring or giving preference to multi-criteria sustainability standards, certifications and labels appropriate to the category. Broader, institution-wide policies should be reported in Part 1, above.
Chemically intensive products and services
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for chemically intensive products and services:
If a product is Green Seal or EcoLogo certified and is listed on their website(s) as such, no proof of certification needs to be submitted.
If a product is Green Seal or EcoLogo certified and is not listed on their website(s) as such, Bidders are required to submit a copy of the product's certificate.
All certificates (if any) and manufacturer letters for Subcategories A-F, must be scarmed and submitted as one PDF document (named
If a product is CFP A certified, a copy of the certificate must be submitted.
See p. 6 of the "Green Cleaning Procedures 1" document attached for more information on Eastern's sustainability criteria for chemically intensive products and services.
Consumable office products
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for consumable office products:
The paper is purchased through a State contract that is used by all Agencies and has been competitively bid in the open market.
Furniture and furnishings
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for furniture and furnishings:
Information Technology (IT) and equipment
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for Information Technology (IT) and equipment:
Food service providers
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for food service providers:
Please note that the best that can be provided is a blurb from the Compass Group/ Chartwells response to my RFP that is allowable under the Confidential & Proprietary restriction where they address sustainability on p.67 of supplement 2.
Information provided by Theresa O'Brien, Director of Fiscal Affairs for Acquisitions & Auxiliary Services.
Around 2017, current our food service provider, Chartwells, submitted their proposal to continue serving us. In their proposal, Chartwells demonstrated their commitment to sustainability, (thus complying with our RFP's green requirements) citing their recent sustainability achievements with Eastern--such as going trayless in the dining halls and starting a food recovery program to donate leftover food to the local soup kitchen, and citing their continual sustainability initiatives--such as purchasing sustainably-sourced seafood and fair-trade coffee.
Garments and linens
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for garments and linens:
Professional service providers
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for professional service providers:
Transportation and fuels
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for transportation and fuels:
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.