Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 80.07 |
Liaison | Lindsey Lyons |
Submission Date | March 5, 2021 |
Dickinson College
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Lindsey
Lyons Assistant Director Center for Sustainability Education |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Yes
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
Internal review
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Benjamin Sweger, Associate Director of Sponsored Projects, Dickinson College
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Dickinson College STARS Liaisons Neil Leary and Lindsey Lyons met with internal reviewer Ben Sweger to discuss the review process. Ben reviewed each credit’s reporting field and associated information (attachments, inventories, and URLs). Using the 2.2 Review Template, Ben updated the status of each credit and where necessary, commented on areas that required revision. Neil and Lindsey then reviewed the template that Ben had completed and updated the STARS report in areas that Ben highlighted as needing revision. They also updated the review template, as necessary. Through the shared review template, Ben was able to identify when Neil and Lindsey made the necessary revisions. Ben then reviewed the updated areas to assure that correct information was presented. Ben then updated all relevant areas in the review template to reflect that all criteria were met.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
---
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
---
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
---
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.