| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 76.02 |
| Liaison | Stephanie MacPhee |
| Submission Date | July 21, 2021 |
Dalhousie University
OP-14: Office Paper Purchasing
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.93 / 1.00 |
Ray
Carrigan Energy Manager Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total annual expenditures on office paper:
200,000
US/Canadian $
Expenditures on office paper with the following levels of post-consumer recycled, agricultural residue, and/or FSC certified content::
| Expenditure Per Level | |
| 10-29 percent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
| 30-49 percent | 12,453 US/Canadian $ |
| 50-69 percent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
| 70-89 percent (or FSC Mix label) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
| 90-100 percent (or FSC Recycled/100% label) | 181,881 US/Canadian $ |
A brief description of the time period from which the figures reported above are drawn:
2019-20 fiscal year (one-year time period)
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Paper ordering information is provided by Dalhousie Print Centre based on all paper ordered through Staples, which is the university's paper supplier. Each order is reviewed and updated based on SKUs and % PCR according to Staples documentation.
Note: % of Paper purchasing by PCR content is very accurate, however the total dollar expenditure may not be. However, the kg of each % PCR content was used based on the total estimated paper expenditure, which arrives at an accurate % PCR $ weighting. Based on how the scoring is determined in this Category, it is only important that the % weighting is correct, which it is.
Note: % of Paper purchasing by PCR content is very accurate, however the total dollar expenditure may not be. However, the kg of each % PCR content was used based on the total estimated paper expenditure, which arrives at an accurate % PCR $ weighting. Based on how the scoring is determined in this Category, it is only important that the % weighting is correct, which it is.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.