Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 53.05 |
Liaison | April Thompson |
Submission Date | Sept. 22, 2023 |
Creighton University
OP-10: Biodiversity
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.00 / 1.00 |
April
Thompson Project and Reporting Coordinator Office of Sustainability |
Does the institution own or manage land that includes or is adjacent to legally protected areas, internationally recognized areas, priority sites for biodiversity, or regions of conservation importance?:
A brief description of the legally protected areas, internationally recognized areas, priority sites for biodiversity, and/or regions of conservation importance:
Has the institution conducted an assessment to identify endangered and vulnerable species (including migratory species) with habitats on land owned or managed by the institution?:
A list of endangered and vulnerable species with habitats on land owned or managed by the institution, by level of extinction risk:
Has the institution conducted an assessment to identify areas of biodiversity importance on land owned or managed by the institution?:
A brief description of areas of biodiversity importance on land owned or managed by the institution:
Identify and document the plant species within each property's landscaping is crucial. Subsequently, determining the proportions of these plants in specific areas becomes essential. While there's a clear goal, akin to the 5-20-30 target for trees, when it comes to plants in the landscape, the exact percentages can vary. Evaluating biodiversity on campus also places significant emphasis on not only utilizing native plants but also recognizing the importance of attracting pollinators.
The methodologies used to identify endangered and vulnerable species and/or areas of biodiversity importance and any ongoing assessment and monitoring mechanisms:
A brief description of the scope of the assessment(s):
A brief description of the plans or programs in place to protect or positively affect identified species, habitats, and/or ecosystems:
Estimated percentage of areas of biodiversity importance that are also protected areas :
Website URL where information about the institution’s biodiversity initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.