| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 67.05 |
| Liaison | Manon Raby |
| Submission Date | May 26, 2017 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Concordia University
OP-20: Employee Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.67 / 2.00 |
Chantal
Forgues Sustainability Coordinator EHS |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Total percentage of the institution’s employees that use more sustainable commuting options:
83.43
The percentage of the institution's employees that use each of the following modes as their primary means of transportation to and from campus::
| Percentage (0-100) | |
| Commute with only the driver in the vehicle (excluding motorcycles and scooters) | 16.57 |
| Walk, bicycle, or use other non-motorized means | 18.89 |
| Vanpool or carpool | 6.10 |
| Take a campus shuttle or public transportation | 58.14 |
| Use a motorcycle, scooter or moped | 0.29 |
| Telecommute for 50 percent or more of their regular work hours | 0 |
None
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
Data comes from the 2013 Concordia Commuter Habit Survey by the Institutional Planning & Analysis Office.
The 2013 Concordia Commuter Habit Survey was gathered online through the internal
Concordia University network of the Institutional Planning Office selecting a representative sample amongst students and employees of the university. The survey was designed based on previous Commuter Habit Survey at Concordia, Société de Transport de Montréal and the Agence Métropolitaine de Transport. The information was collected over the 2013 Fall semester over three consecutive weeks; it was launched on November 11, 2013 and closed on December 2, 2013, with two reminders sent on November 19 and 25.
None
The website URL where information about sustainable transportation for employees is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.