| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 67.05 |
| Liaison | Manon Raby |
| Submission Date | May 26, 2017 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Concordia University
EN-14: Participation in Public Policy
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
2.00 / 2.00 |
Sylvie
Bourassa Executive Director, Governmental Relations Office of the President |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution advocate for national, state/provincial, or local public policies that support campus sustainability or that otherwise advance sustainability?:
Yes
None
A brief description of how the institution engages in public policy advocacy for sustainability, including the issues, legislation, and ordinances for or against which the institution has advocated:
In February 2016, the President of Concordia University published an op-ed in Quebec's newspapers advocating the federal government for more support on clean/green technologies research and development. More specifically, it was indicated to:
- Support basic and applied research related to clean/green technologies
- Support entrepreneurship and startups to help clean/green tech research getting from lab to market
- Support clean/green technology companies scaling up (e.g. through potential tax credits)
References:
Montreal Gazette (February 6, 2016) - Opinion: It's high time for Canada to invest in developing green technology (http://montrealgazette.com/opinion/columnists/opinion-its-high-time-for-canada-to-invest-in-developing-green-technology)
La Presse (February 12, 2016) - Investir pour bâtir un Canada propre et durable (http://www.lapresse.ca/debats/votre-opinion/201602/11/01-4949655-investir-pour-batir-un-canada-propre-et-durable.php)
None
A brief description of other political positions the institution has taken during the previous three years:
---
None
A brief description of political donations the institution made during the previous three years (if applicable):
---
None
The website URL where information about the institution’s advocacy efforts is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.