| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 48.46 |
| Liaison | Gabrielle Lommel |
| Submission Date | Dec. 16, 2020 |
Concordia College - Moorhead
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Jackie
Maahs Sustainability Coordinator Student Engagement |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
McKinley Siegle - Student - Concordia College
Kate Folkman - Student - Concordia College
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Both students were chosen to review sections of the report that they had no part in collecting the data for. The students reviewed both the data gathered in our comprehensive STARS credit tracking system as well as the data that was ultimately input into the STARS reporting system. The reviewers checked for discrepancies between data in our credit tracking system and the data entered into the STARS reporting system. They then compared all data against the credit info pages as well as the "common issues" listed on AASHE's review template. The reviewers noted any issues in the "Notes and Issues" column on our internal credit tracking spreadsheet. When an issue was identified I, Jackie, reviewed those issues and corrected them accordingly. Once the issue had been resolved, I noted the changes and highlighted all columns green to indicate that the assurance process was complete.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
All reviews were completed on the same credit tracking document, so I only have on completed review document to share.
All reviews were completed on the same credit tracking document, so I only have on completed review document to share.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.