| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 48.69 |
| Liaison | Tina Evans |
| Submission Date | Aug. 20, 2024 |
Colorado Mountain College
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Tina
Evans Professor, Sustainability Studies Sustainability Studies |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Institutional Research, Colorado Mountain College
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Staff of the Institutional Research Office at CMC have carefully reviewed all sections of the report and have sought clarification as necessary from the STARS Coordination and Implementation Team. They have checked the report for consistency and for potential data gathering and entry errors. Great care was taken by the IR team as they reviewed the fine details of all aspects of the report, and some errors and inconsistencies were identified that were remedied. The IR team describes the process flow of their review in their attached affirmation letter.
The AASHE STARS review template is attached. This file documents the two reviews undertaken by IR: the first review with comments provided and the second review done after the STARS team reviewed initial comments from IR and made necessary changes.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.