Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 65.41 |
Liaison | Ian Johnson |
Submission Date | April 19, 2024 |
Colorado College
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Mae
Rohrbach Sustainability Coordinator Office of Sustainability |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Konrad Schlarbaum, Sustainability Director for the Office of Sustainability at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs Kayla Williams, Sustainability Program Leader (student employee) for the Office of Sustainability at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs Mandi (MJ) Johnson, Sustainability Program Manager (student employee) for the Office of Sustainability at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs Keenan Powell, Sustainability Program Manager (student employee) for the Office of Sustainability at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs Kyle Cabs, Sustainability Program Manager (student employee) for the Office of Sustainability at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs Bailey Parenteau, Sustainability Program Manager (student employee) for the Office of Sustainability at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
The external third-party reviewers from the University of Colorado Colorado Springs (UCCS) Office of Sustainability completed a first review of the STARS report directly coordinating with the STARS Liaison, Mae Rohrbach. Feedback and comments were then reviewed by Mae and CC Office of Sustainability STARS Team and returned to the UCCS Office of Sustainability for a second review on the credits that initially needed review from Colorado College. Any remaining data errors/inconsistencies in the report were addressed directly between Konrad Schlarbaum and Mae Rohrbach before submission.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.