| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 70.62 |
| Liaison | Darcy Coughlan |
| Submission Date | Dec. 22, 2022 |
Coastal Carolina University
EN-6: Assessing Sustainability Culture
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.50 / 1.00 |
Jeremy
Monday Director of Sustain Coastal Sustain Coastal |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Does the institution conduct an assessment of sustainability culture?:
Yes
Which of the following best describes the cultural assessment? The assessment is administered to::
The entire campus community (students and employees) directly or by representative sample
Which of the following best describes the structure of the cultural assessment? The assessment is administered::
Without a follow-up assessment of the same cohort or representative samples of the same population
A brief description of how and when the cultural assessment(s) were developed and/or adopted:
In January 2020 the campus community was surveyed on the effectiveness of a recent sustainability program that was launched to reduce waste, increase recycling, and make campus cleaner. The assessment aimed to measure the impact on behaviors by faculty and staff in regards to recognizing waste creation, recycling participation, and recycling knowledge.
A copy or sample of the questions related to sustainability culture:
A sample of the questions related to sustainability culture or the website URL where the assessment tool is available:
See attached for a copy of the survey and results.
A brief description of how representative samples were reached (if applicable) and how the cultural assessment is administered:
This survey was administered in three waves:
Via a scannable QR code:
- The QR code was on flyers placed on mini‐bins after sanitization over the University's 2019‐2020 winter break
‐ The survey was available from placement of the flyers through January 27th
‐There were 9 responses via the distribution method; because an unknown number of potential respondents were exposed to the QR code, a response rate cannot be calculated.
Via email invitation to staff members:
‐ An invitation to complete the survey was sent to a randomly‐selected 50% of the University's non‐custodial staff members
‐The survey was available from January 7th to January 27th, 2020 with reminders on the 13th and 21st
‐227 of the 517 invited staff members responded, for a response rate of 43.9%
Via email invitation to faculty members:
‐An invitation to complete the survey was sent to a randomly selected 50% of the University's faculty members, stratified by faculty rank and full‐time /part‐time status
‐The survey was available from January 13th through January 27th, 2020 with reminders on the 21st and the 27th
‐146 of the 338 invited faculty members responded, for a response rate of 43.2%
Via a scannable QR code:
- The QR code was on flyers placed on mini‐bins after sanitization over the University's 2019‐2020 winter break
‐ The survey was available from placement of the flyers through January 27th
‐There were 9 responses via the distribution method; because an unknown number of potential respondents were exposed to the QR code, a response rate cannot be calculated.
Via email invitation to staff members:
‐ An invitation to complete the survey was sent to a randomly‐selected 50% of the University's non‐custodial staff members
‐The survey was available from January 7th to January 27th, 2020 with reminders on the 13th and 21st
‐227 of the 517 invited staff members responded, for a response rate of 43.9%
Via email invitation to faculty members:
‐An invitation to complete the survey was sent to a randomly selected 50% of the University's faculty members, stratified by faculty rank and full‐time /part‐time status
‐The survey was available from January 13th through January 27th, 2020 with reminders on the 21st and the 27th
‐146 of the 338 invited faculty members responded, for a response rate of 43.2%
A brief summary of results from the cultural assessment:
See attached for a copy of the survey and results.
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.