Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 48.57 |
Liaison | Jennifer McMillin |
Submission Date | June 15, 2017 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Cleveland State University
PA-9: Sustainable Investment
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.00 / 4.00 |
Jennifer
McMillin Director of Sustainability Facilities l Architect l Safety l Technology |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Option 1: Positive Sustainability Investment
No
Total value of the investment pool:
---
Value of holdings in each of the following categories:
Value of Holdings | |
Sustainable industries (e.g. renewable energy or sustainable forestry) | --- |
Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g. using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy) | --- |
Sustainability investment funds (e.g. a renewable energy or impact investment fund) | --- |
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or the equivalent | --- |
Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens (or the equivalent) | --- |
Green revolving loan funds that are funded from the endowment | --- |
If any of the above is greater than zero, provide:
---
Percentage of the institution's investment pool in positive sustainability investments:
0
Option 2: Investor Engagement
No
Sustainable Investment Policy
No
None
A copy of the sustainable investment policy:
---
None
The sustainable investment policy:
---
None
Does the institution use its sustainable investment policy to select and guide investment managers?:
---
None
A brief description of how the policy is applied, including recent examples:
---
Proxy Voting
---
None
A copy of the proxy voting guidelines or proxy record:
---
None
A brief description of how managers are adhering to proxy voting guidelines:
---
Shareholder Resolutions
---
None
Examples of how the institution has engaged with corporations in its portfolio about sustainability issues during the previous three years:
---
Negative Screens / Divestment Efforts
---
None
A brief description of the negative screens and how they have been implemented:
---
None
Approximate percentage of the endowment that the negative screens apply to:
---
Investor Networks
---
None
A brief description of the investor networks and/or collaborations:
---
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Additional documentation includes the CSU Foundation's ESG and Sustainability scores from Morningstar for all of the Foundation’s mutual fund investments.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.