Overall Rating Silver
Overall Score 61.50
Liaison Jennifer Goree
Submission Date June 17, 2024

STARS v2.2

Clemson University
OP-22: Rainwater Management

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 2.00 Snowil Lopes
Energy Engineer
Energy Awareness
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Which of the following best describes the institution’s approach to rainwater management?:
Less comprehensive policies, plans or guidelines that incorporate green infrastructure

A brief description of the institution’s green infrastructure and LID practices:

Clemson University has established Policy 17 to aid with stormwater planning and management on campus. This policy suggests the use of low impact development methods where practical throughout campus.


A copy of the institution’s rainwater management policy, plan, and/or guidelines:
---

A brief description of the institution’s rainwater management policy, plan, and/or guidelines that supports the responses above:

Permeable Pavement has been installed to help promote infiltration where the rain falls instead of having it run off like traditional pavement. An example of this can be found at the parking log in front of the Strom Thurmond Institute. Rain Gardens are simply gardens that help to intercept stormwater runoff and infiltrate it into the ground. To date there are 4 rain gardens installed on campus, with plans to incorporate two more at the new Business Center building. Planter Boxes are featured at the Life Sciences Building on campus. These gardens are engineered in a stair step pattern that allows rain water to flow from one box to another while infiltrating into the ground. Rain Barrels are used to collect and harvest rainwater off of rooftops. One of these can be found outside of Lehotsky Hall. 


Optional Fields 

Website URL where information about the institution’s green infrastructure and LID practices is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.