| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 53.85 |
| Liaison | Jennifer Goree |
| Submission Date | Nov. 26, 2018 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Clemson University
IN-18: Pre-Submission Review
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.50 / 0.50 |
Michele
Isnard Service Manager, Sightlines Member Services |
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Michele Isnard - Sightlines, Service Manager
Jake Haslam, Sightlines, Analyst
Sightlines has been contracted by Clemson University to lead the STARS analysis efforts. The project participants are: Shelly Giannini, Sightlines Project Lead & Kelly Marchione, Sightlines Senior Analyst. The pre-submission reviewers have had no contact with Clemson University or the data collection efforts.
A brief description of the review process:
Michele Isnard reviewed the following sections: IC, EN, OP, PA and IN
Jake Haslam reviewed : AC
Michele and Jake noted any inconsistencies in the data and left detailed notes. When the first review was complete, Shelly Giannini and Kelly Marchione reviewed the results and made the corrections identified.
Which of the following describes the review process?:
Affirmation from the reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from an additional reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 2nd reviewer:
Affirmation from a 3rd reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 3rd reviewer:
Affirmation from a 4th reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 4th reviewer:
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.