| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 68.91 |
| Liaison | Susan Powers |
| Submission Date | April 10, 2024 |
Clarkson University
AC-9: Research and Scholarship
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
12.00 / 12.00 |
Susan
Powers Director of the Institute for a Sustainable Environment ISE |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total number of employees that conduct research:
229
Number of employees engaged in sustainability research:
127
Percentage of employees that conduct research that are engaged in sustainability research:
55.46
Total number of academic departments that include at least one employee who conducts research:
23
Number of academic departments that include at least one employee who conducts sustainability research:
22
Percentage of departments that conduct research that are engaged in sustainability research:
95.65
A copy of the inventory of the institution’s sustainability research (upload):
Inventory of the institution’s sustainability research:
---
A brief description of the methodology the institution followed to complete the research inventory:
Approach
1. List of active faculty F20 and F21 was compiled (HR)
2. these were combined into a merged list to identify any faculty who worked in either year
3. The list was reduced to identify those expected to do scholarly work. This included deleting adjuncts, instructors, clinical faculty, professors of practice and military science faculty .
4. Numerous resources were reviewed to identify scholarly activity for the remaining faculty
* 3-y pubs list with "clarkson university" affiliation extracted from web of science
* pubs list from RSB with SDGs indicated (only ones with high relevance considered)
* SRS data dashboard for grants received
* Web presence on clarkson.edu
* google scholar search
5. Example pubs / grants, books that had some connection to sustainability application were identified and added to the spreadsheet. Related SDGs were identified (the detailed sub goals were reviewed to identify matches, though only the 1-16 primary numbers were recorded).
Note: Basic science / engrg that has some future application for sustainability but for which that application was not identified in the title or abstract were not included. For example, there is a lot of cancer related and materials chemistry basic science that was not included here. In the end - this was a judgement call and subject to interpretation.
1. List of active faculty F20 and F21 was compiled (HR)
2. these were combined into a merged list to identify any faculty who worked in either year
3. The list was reduced to identify those expected to do scholarly work. This included deleting adjuncts, instructors, clinical faculty, professors of practice and military science faculty .
4. Numerous resources were reviewed to identify scholarly activity for the remaining faculty
* 3-y pubs list with "clarkson university" affiliation extracted from web of science
* pubs list from RSB with SDGs indicated (only ones with high relevance considered)
* SRS data dashboard for grants received
* Web presence on clarkson.edu
* google scholar search
5. Example pubs / grants, books that had some connection to sustainability application were identified and added to the spreadsheet. Related SDGs were identified (the detailed sub goals were reviewed to identify matches, though only the 1-16 primary numbers were recorded).
Note: Basic science / engrg that has some future application for sustainability but for which that application was not identified in the title or abstract were not included. For example, there is a lot of cancer related and materials chemistry basic science that was not included here. In the end - this was a judgement call and subject to interpretation.
Website URL where information about the institution’s sustainability research is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Data collected from FY20 and FY21 and report finalized in FY23.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.