Overall Rating Bronze
Overall Score 35.50
Liaison Brian Kelley
Submission Date March 1, 2025

STARS v3.0

Christopher Newport University
OP-12: Waste Generation and Recovery

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 0.87 / 5.00 Brian Kelley
Sustainability Specialist
Facilities Management
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

12.1 Non-hazardous waste generated per person

Performance year for non-hazardous waste:
2023

Peer group:
Master’s colleges and universities

Non-hazardous waste recycled:
157.80 Metric tons

Non-hazardous waste composted:
0 Metric tons

Non-hazardous waste prepared for reuse:
0 Metric tons

Non-hazardous waste disposed of to a landfill or incinerator:
1,442.05 Metric tons

Estimated percentage of non-hazardous waste disposed of to a landfill or incinerator that is disposed of to a waste-to-energy (WTE) facility:
---

Full-time equivalent student enrollment:
4,426

Full-time equivalent of employees:
987

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following five figures:

Total non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal:
157.80 Metric tons

Annual non-hazardous waste generated:
1,599.85 Metric tons

Full-time equivalent students and employees:
5,413

Annual non-hazardous waste generated per person:
295.56 Kilograms

Points earned for indicator OP 12.1:
0

12.2 Non-hazardous waste generated per square meter

Gross floor area of building space:
272,397 Square meters

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following two figures:

Annual non-hazardous waste generated per unit of floor area:
5.87 Kilograms per square meter

Points earned for indicator OP 12.2:
0.65

12.3 Percentage of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following two figures:

Percentage of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal:
9.86

Points earned for indicator OP 12.3:
0.22

12.4 Percentage of construction and demolition waste diverted from disposal

Has the institution conducted one or more major construction, renovation, and/or demolition projects within the previous three years?:
Yes

Does the institution have sufficient data on construction and demolition waste to pursue this indicator?:
No

Performance year for construction and demolition waste:
---

Construction and demolition waste recycled:
---

Construction and demolition waste prepared for reuse:
---

Construction and demolition waste disposed of to a landfill or incinerator:
---

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following four figures:

Total construction and demolition waste diverted from disposal:
---

Annual construction and demolition waste generated:
---

Percentage of construction and demolition waste diverted from disposal:
---

Points earned for indicator OP 12.4:
0

Optional documentation

Notes about the information provided for this credit:

FY 22-23 data was used to give a more accurate representation of total waste and recycling generated on campus. 

 

For Fall 2022, the trash and recycling vendor at the time, GFL Industries, provided fullness levels for each top-load location on campus for the months of August through December.  The standard volume to weight calculation of 92 lbs per yard from the EPA was used to estimate weights for these months.  

 

For Spring 2023, due to the expiration of the GFL contract, Waste Management was chosen as the waste vendor and TFC was chosen as the recycling vendor.  Unfortunately, it has been a challenge to acquire proper fullness reports from these vendors, so estimates were determined using the data from Fall 2022.  

 

The two compactors at the campus dining halls along with one permanent roll-off and some temporary roll-offs are exact weights and summer months were estimated at half capacity due to limited operations.  Move-out waste is also included, but surplus items and scrap metal recycling are excluded. 

 

For a complete breakdown on the methodology statistics, please review this document.

 

Although some construction debris is recycled and information is provided at times, it depends on the project and is an improvement opportunity to include reporting requirements for all rennovations and construction projects.     

 

 


Additional documentation for this credit:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.