Overall Rating | Bronze |
---|---|
Overall Score | 35.50 |
Liaison | Brian Kelley |
Submission Date | March 1, 2025 |
Christopher Newport University
IL-51: Sustainability Projects Fund
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
![]() |
1.00 / 1.00 |
Brian
Kelley Sustainability Specialist Facilities Management |
Does the institution have a dedicated fund to support campus sustainability projects that is ongoing and includes a multi-stakeholder decision-making process to determine which projects receive funding?:
Name of the institution’s sustainability projects fund:
Which of the following best describes the primary source of funding for the sustainability projects fund?:
Year the institution’s sustainability projects fund was established:
Narrative and/or website URL providing an overview of the institution’s sustainability projects fund:
A large donation has been given in thanks to the Redekop Family Foundation to implement a Revolving Green Fund to assist with the funding of large sustainability projects with a Return on Investment. A department will apply to borrow money from the fund and, if approved, the department will then pay back the principal amount with savings per year by implementing the project. The amount paid each year will be based on calculated savings per year prior to approval vs. actual savings and will be paid at the same time each year until the principal amount borrowed is repaid to the fund.
For example, a $100,000 LED lighting project would start with a proposal from a department that includes estimated savings of lets say $20,000 each year. The department would receive the money for the project and pay $20,000 on September 1st each year over 5 years to repay the total of $100,000. Interest may be added depending on the ROI timeline, which would be discussed prior to approval. The system GRITS will be used to track cash flow from the fund.
In addition to the Revolving Green Fund, a separate fund is being created for projects that are important to sustainability, but may not have an ROI. In this instance, once the money is spent, new money would have to be acquired through donation avenues.
Narrative outlining the multi-stakeholder decision-making process used to determine which projects receive funding through the sustainability projects fund:
Projects are a collaboration between departments, the Energy Manager, the Sustainability Specialist, and the Director of Facility Planning & Sustainability.
After initial meetings to determine the scope, costs, and Return on Investment calculations, the project proposal will be shared with the Vice President for Facilities and Campus Operations within the President's Office.
Priority is given to projects with the highest Return on Investment such as incorporating LEDs into residence halls and other campus buildings.
The calculated savings per year is determined before the start of the project and is to be paid at the same time each year until the principal amount is repaid. All terms are decided prior to the project implementation and may include interest based on the situation. GRITS is used to track cash flow from the fund.
Optional documentation
Additional documentation for this credit:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.