Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 75.79 |
Liaison | Robert Stroufe |
Submission Date | Sept. 22, 2015 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Chatham University
OP-12: Electronics Purchasing
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.99 / 1.00 |
Paul
Steinhaus CIO Information Technology |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution have an institution-wide stated preference to purchase computers and/or other electronic products that are EPEAT registered or meet similar multi-criteria sustainability standards for electronic products?:
Yes
None
A copy of the electronics purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines:
---
None
The electronics purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines :
In accordance with our institutional mission of sustainability, Information Technology has committed to purchasing EPEAT-listed products whenever possible.
None
A brief description of steps the institution has taken to ensure that the purchasing policy, directives, or guidelines are followed:
The Sustainability Director met with Chatham's CIO and reviewed the EPEAT program, showing them how to search the ratings. IT used the EPEAT list to refine their electronics choices. We are committed to purchasing Mac Laptops for first year students, so it was a positive step for our university's sustainability commitments now that Apple is a participant in EPEAT.
None
Does the institution wish to pursue to pursue Part 2 of this credit (expenditures on EPEAT registered electronics)?:
Yes
None
Expenditures on EPEAT registered desktop and laptop computers, displays, thin clients, televisions, and imaging equipment::
Expenditure Per Level | |
EPEAT Bronze | 0 US/Canadian $ |
EPEAT Silver | 0 US/Canadian $ |
EPEAT Gold | 356,530.05 US/Canadian $ |
None
Total expenditures on desktop and laptop computers, displays, thin clients, televisions, and imaging equipment:
360,701.53
US/Canadian $
None
The website URL where information about the institution's electronics purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.