Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 59.66 |
Liaison | Christina Erickson |
Submission Date | Aug. 15, 2022 |
Champlain College
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
2.79 / 3.00 |
Christina
Erickson Sustainability Director Campus Planning |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Greenhouse gas emissions inventory
Yes
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:
GHGs are calculated using the SIMAP tool. As of 2021, data is collected and entered into the SIMAP by Christina Erickson
Scope 3 includes Student Study Abroad Air Travel, Faculty-led travel courses, international service trips, student community, faculty/staff commuting, directly financed air travel, directly financed ground travel, T&D losses, paper and wastewater.
Scope 3 includes Student Study Abroad Air Travel, Faculty-led travel courses, international service trips, student community, faculty/staff commuting, directly financed air travel, directly financed ground travel, T&D losses, paper and wastewater.
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
Yes
A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
The FY2021 inventory has been validated by an internal team (Campus Sustainability Operations Team) over several meetings and review sessions.
Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
---
Scope 1 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Stationary combustion | 1,206.30 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) | 114.58 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
1,320.88
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 2 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Imported electricity | 1,598.88 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Imported thermal energy | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
1,598.88
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
GHG emissions from biomass combustion
0
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 3 GHG emissions
Yes or No | Weight in MTCO2e | |
Business travel | Yes | 12.11 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Commuting | Yes | 591.55 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Purchased goods and services | Yes | 18.28 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Capital goods | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | Yes | 87.11 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Waste generated in operations | --- | 60.43 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources | --- | 15.01 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
784.49
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:
Business travel includes air and ground travel
Commuting data comes from bi-annual survey by CATMA
Purchased goods reflects copy paper purchases
Fuel/Energy reflects our T&D losses
Waste is calculated from estimated annual weight
Other reflects wastewater emissions
Commuting data comes from bi-annual survey by CATMA
Purchased goods reflects copy paper purchases
Fuel/Energy reflects our T&D losses
Waste is calculated from estimated annual weight
Other reflects wastewater emissions
Part 2. Air pollutant emissions inventory
Yes
Annual weight of emissions for::
Weight of Emissions | |
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | 0.33 Tons |
Sulfur oxides (SOx) | 0 Tons |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | --- |
Particulate matter (PM) | 0 Tons |
Ozone (O3) | 0 Tons |
Lead (Pb) | 0 Tons |
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | 0 Tons |
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | 0 Tons |
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | 0 Tons |
Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
Yes or No | |
Major stationary sources | Yes |
Area sources | --- |
Mobile sources | Yes |
Commuting | Yes |
Off-site electricity production | Yes |
None
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
GHGs are calculated using the SIPMP tool by our Director of Service & Sustainability Learning (Christina Erickson) using data collected from various offices across campus.
For boilers - we account for the natural gas consumed each year.
Additionally, we account for any refrigerant leaks in HVAC systems & appliances.
These are included in our total GHG inventory, as mentioned in OP-1.
FY2021 Air emissions from stationary sources (natural gas) =
CO2 = 1,314,722 kg
CH4 = 122 kg
N2O = 10 kg
For boilers - we account for the natural gas consumed each year.
Additionally, we account for any refrigerant leaks in HVAC systems & appliances.
These are included in our total GHG inventory, as mentioned in OP-1.
FY2021 Air emissions from stationary sources (natural gas) =
CO2 = 1,314,722 kg
CH4 = 122 kg
N2O = 10 kg
Optional Fields
---
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
https://www.champlain.edu/Documents/Sustain-Champlain/Annual%20Reports/ChamplainGHGInventory2021.pdf
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
FY21 emission reflect a very a-typical year, due to the COVID pandemic.
The 2020-2021 Academic year was nothing typical. The Burlington campus had:
* Students attending hybrid classes (some remote, some in-person)
* Approximately half the number of residential students
* A few residence halls operating as isolation or quarantine halls; two completely unused (North, Sanders)
* Most staff working from home
* Some faculty working on campus; others working and teaching remotely
* Increased air exchanges and filtration in buildings, 24/7
* Increased use of disposable / take out dining ware for students
* No study abroad, faculty-led field courses, or service trips
* Minimal travel for admissions and other sponsored-travel
The 2020-2021 Academic year was nothing typical. The Burlington campus had:
* Students attending hybrid classes (some remote, some in-person)
* Approximately half the number of residential students
* A few residence halls operating as isolation or quarantine halls; two completely unused (North, Sanders)
* Most staff working from home
* Some faculty working on campus; others working and teaching remotely
* Increased air exchanges and filtration in buildings, 24/7
* Increased use of disposable / take out dining ware for students
* No study abroad, faculty-led field courses, or service trips
* Minimal travel for admissions and other sponsored-travel
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.