| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 55.91 |
| Liaison | Andrew Bernard |
| Submission Date | July 26, 2019 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Central New Mexico Community College
PA-12: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.42 / 1.00 |
Molly
Blumhoefer Campus as a Living Lab and Sustainability Project Manager PPD |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution conducted a survey or other evaluation that allows for anonymous feedback to measure employee satisfaction and engagement during the previous three years?:
Yes
Percentage of employees (staff and faculty) assessed, directly or by representative sample (0-100):
42.40
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
Annual and Ongoing: Content areas include: Professional Development, Work/Life Balance, Governance, Facilities, Safety and Security, Advancement, Leadership, Support and Services to Employees, Rewards and Recognition, and Communication.
The percentages of respondents vary from year to year. The 42.4% represents the data found in this report (2017) subsequent reports are not yet available. https://www.cnm.edu/depts/opie/documents/employee-surveys/2017CNMCESSExecSummary.pdf
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation (including examples from the previous three years):
The Office of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness is charged with reviewing results of surveys and getting information out to the college community regarding results and areas of greatest impact for improvement. Recent examples of this includes the Rewards and Recognition Team formed to address the gaps identified by employees. Another example includes the Employee Development Action Project Team that was developed to address the gaps identified by employees in professional development, adva
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.