| Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 31.21 |
| Liaison | Benjamin Newton |
| Submission Date | June 14, 2017 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Central Community College
EN-10: Community Partnerships
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
3.00 / 3.00 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
1st Partnership
Grand Island Bike and Walk Committee
Does the institution provide financial or material support for the partnership? :
Yes
Which of the following best describes the partnership timeframe?:
Multi-year or ongoing
Which of the following best describes the partnership’s sustainability focus?:
The partnership simultaneously supports social equity and wellbeing, economic prosperity, and ecological health
Are underrepresented groups and/or vulnerable populations engaged as equal partners in strategic planning, decision-making, implementation and review? (Yes, No, or Not Sure):
Yes
A brief description of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability, including website URL (if available) and information to support each affirmative response above:
CCC and the Central District Health Department collaborate on walking and biking events and city planning. This is an ongoing partnership where CCC and the health department collaborate on multiple committees to develop a complete streets policy and to promote walking and biking. CCC has had students from underrepresented groups meet with the committee to provide feedback, and CCC has provided funds to improve signage on walking and biking trails. The goal of the committees is to provide all citizens a safe option to walk and bike to locations in town as not everyone can afford a car, and to reduce the number of vehicles on the road and thus reduce vehicle emissions.
2nd Partnership
---
Does the institution provide financial or material support for the partnership? (2nd partnership):
---
Which of the following best describes the partnership timeframe? (2nd partnership):
---
Which of the following best describes the partnership’s sustainability focus? (2nd partnership):
---
Are underrepresented groups and/or vulnerable populations engaged as equal partners in strategic planning, decision-making, implementation and review? (2nd partnership) (Yes, No, or Not Sure):
---
A brief description of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability, including website URL (if available) and information to support each affirmative response above (2nd partnership):
---
3rd Partnership
---
Does the institution provide financial or material support for the partnership? (3rd partnership):
---
Which of the following best describes the partnership timeframe? (3rd partnership):
---
Which of the following best describes the partnership’s sustainability focus? (3rd partnership):
---
Are underrepresented groups and/or vulnerable populations engaged as equal partners in strategic planning, decision-making, implementation and review? (3rd partnership) (Yes, No, or Unknown):
---
A brief description of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability, including website URL (if available) and information to support each affirmative response above (3rd partnership):
---
Optional Fields
---
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.