| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 52.81 |
| Liaison | Stephan Classen |
| Submission Date | Oct. 14, 2021 |
Cascadia College
PA-13: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Jodie
Galvan Assistant Director of Sustainable Practices Student Learning |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution conducted a survey or other evaluation that allows for anonymous feedback to measure employee satisfaction and engagement during the previous three years?:
Yes
Percentage of employees assessed, directly or by representative sample:
100
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
We conduct an employee satisfaction survey every three years. It is administered to 100% of permanent employees. Student workers receive a student version.
The survey, known as the Cascadia College Employee Satisfaction Survey (CESS) includes a number of standard questions used by colleges across the country as well as the following nine specific questions added this year:
1. This institution demonstrates support of cultural diversity.
2. This institution values trust.
3. My supervisor supports and understands my job.
4. My workplace morale is suitable.
5. Access to technology at this institution meets my expectations.
6. I have opportunities to engage in learning at this institution.
7. The campus facilities are cleaned and maintained in a satisfactory manner.
8. My workload allows me to engage fully in campus activities.
9. The campus’ leadership encourages communication between departments.
The survey, known as the Cascadia College Employee Satisfaction Survey (CESS) includes a number of standard questions used by colleges across the country as well as the following nine specific questions added this year:
1. This institution demonstrates support of cultural diversity.
2. This institution values trust.
3. My supervisor supports and understands my job.
4. My workplace morale is suitable.
5. Access to technology at this institution meets my expectations.
6. I have opportunities to engage in learning at this institution.
7. The campus facilities are cleaned and maintained in a satisfactory manner.
8. My workload allows me to engage fully in campus activities.
9. The campus’ leadership encourages communication between departments.
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation:
We have a number of mechanisms in place to address issues raised by the evaluation as well as other issues that are brought to the attention of leadership including the following: monthly navigators meeting (representatives of faculty and staff groups bring feedback/concerns/ideas directly to the president); coffees for three with the president and two employees; faculty assembly, hourly assembly and exempt assembly; quarterly all-campus DIAs (Days of Inquiry and Assembly); weekly president's letter; quarterly strategic plan updates; and regular departmental meetings.
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.