| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 67.08 |
| Liaison | Philip Mansfield |
| Submission Date | March 4, 2022 |
Carleton University
OP-3: Building Design and Construction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
2.05 / 3.00 |
Philip
Mansfield Sustainability Manager Facilities Management and Planning |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total floor area of newly constructed or renovated building space:
52,667
Square meters
Floor area of eligible building space designed and built in accordance with published green building codes, policies, and/or rating systems:
| Floor area | |
| Certified at the highest achievable level under a multi-attribute GBC rating system for design and construction (e.g., LEED BD+C Platinum or Certified Living Building) | 0 Square meters |
| Certified at the 2nd highest level under a 4- or 5-tier, multi-attribute GBC rating system for design and construction (e.g., LEED BD+C Gold) | 29,152 Square meters |
| Certified at mid-level under a 3- or 5-tier, multi-attribute GBC rating system for design and construction (e.g., BREEAM Very Good) | 0 Square meters |
| Certified at a step above minimum level under ar 4- or 5-tier, multi-attribute GBC rating system for design and construction (e.g., LEED BD+C Silver) | 0 Square meters |
| Certified at minimum level under a multi-attribute GBC rating system for design and construction (e.g., LEED BD+C Certified) | 0 Square meters |
| Certified/verified at any level under a multi-attribute, non-GBC rating system for design and construction, a green building code, or a single-attribute rating system for design and construction | 23,515 Square meters |
| Designed and built in accordance with a multi-attribute green building code, policy, guideline, or rating system, but not certified/verified | 0 Square meters |
| Designed and built in accordance with a single-attribute green building code, policy, guideline, or rating system, but not certified/verified | 0 Square meters |
| Total | 52,666.98 Square meters |
Percentage of newly constructed or renovated building space certified under a green building rating system for design and construction:
100.00
A list of new construction and major renovation projects that indicates the green building code, policy/guideline, or rating system that applies to each building:
Carleton University has committed to ensuring that all new construction and major renovations are assessed against the Green Globes Rating system and will achieve at minimum a rating of 3 out of 5.
The Green Globes system is an internationally recognised, third party, certification and building environmental design and management tool. It allows an evaluation against such factors as:project management, energy consumption, site use, space and water optimization, and waste management.
To date a number of buildings have been assessed across the campus including:
•Canal Building (5 Globes)
•Health Sciences Building (Design) (5 Globes)
•Residence Commons (4 Globes)
•River Building (4 Globes)
•Herzberg Laboratories addition (4 Globes)
•Russell-Grenville House (4 Globes)
•Frontenac (3 Globes)
•MacOdrum Library renovation (3 Globes)
•Lennox-Addington (3 Globes)
•Nicol (4 Globes)
The Green Globes system is an internationally recognised, third party, certification and building environmental design and management tool. It allows an evaluation against such factors as:project management, energy consumption, site use, space and water optimization, and waste management.
To date a number of buildings have been assessed across the campus including:
•Canal Building (5 Globes)
•Health Sciences Building (Design) (5 Globes)
•Residence Commons (4 Globes)
•River Building (4 Globes)
•Herzberg Laboratories addition (4 Globes)
•Russell-Grenville House (4 Globes)
•Frontenac (3 Globes)
•MacOdrum Library renovation (3 Globes)
•Lennox-Addington (3 Globes)
•Nicol (4 Globes)
An inventory of new construction and major renovation projects that indicates the green building code, policy/guideline, or rating system that applies to each building:
---
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.