Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 67.08
Liaison Philip Mansfield
Submission Date March 4, 2022

STARS v2.2

Carleton University
IN-40: Sustainability Projects Fund

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 0.50 / 0.50 Philip Mansfield
Sustainability Manager
Facilities Management and Planning
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Name of the institution’s sustainability projects fund:
Green Fund Program

Which of the following best describes the primary source of funding for the sustainability projects fund?:
Department driven

Year the institution’s sustainability projects fund was established:
2,014

A brief description of the institution’s sustainability projects fund:
The major $1 million Green Revolving Fund (GRF) provides capital for high performance campus design, operations, maintenance, and occupant behavior projects. The micro Green Engagement Fund (GEF) provides capital limited to $500 or less, to both engage and communicate sustainability issues or ideas. GEF projects do not require a payback on investment.

A brief description of the multi-stakeholder decision-making process used to determine which projects receive funding through the sustainability projects fund:
The main criteria for funding projects will be to undertake those with both a positive environmental impact and strong financial plan. In order to fully assess project submissions the Green Fund Committee (GFC) will receive applications throughout the year, with submissions reviewed in December.

Funding will be provided for up to 3 projects, under both the GRF and GEF. While we welcome all ideas and innovations to inspire sustainability, proposed projects should aim to support the goals and objectives outlined in Carleton’s Sustainability Strategic Plan, Energy Master Plan and Campus Master Plan. These all support our wider aims to reduce the university’s carbon footprint and enhance sustainability.

Optional Fields

Website URL where information about the sustainability projects fund is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.