Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 64.62 |
Liaison | Sarah Fortner |
Submission Date | March 3, 2022 |
Carleton College
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
2.79 / 3.00 |
Alexandra
Miller Sustainability Program Coordinator Energy and Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Greenhouse gas emissions inventory
Yes
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:
Carleton uses the Sustainability Indicator Management and Analysis Platform (SIMAP) methodology.
This tool is used by Sightlines as part of the Sustainability Solutions service. Sightlines annually works with Carleton College Facilities staff to collect data to compile, calculate and analyze institutional GHG data.
The change for FY20 is using location-based for our electricity emissions and takes into account the local grid. We also had our geothermal system for 50% of our buildings completely online. Although the majority of our students went home for the spring term due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we did not see a major decrease in emissions due to this.
This tool is used by Sightlines as part of the Sustainability Solutions service. Sightlines annually works with Carleton College Facilities staff to collect data to compile, calculate and analyze institutional GHG data.
The change for FY20 is using location-based for our electricity emissions and takes into account the local grid. We also had our geothermal system for 50% of our buildings completely online. Although the majority of our students went home for the spring term due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we did not see a major decrease in emissions due to this.
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
Yes
A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
Carleton hires Sightlines, a facilities benchmarking and analysis firm, to assist with and verify our annual greenhouse gas emissions data. This information is reviewed twice with Facilities staff to confirm the accuracy and explain major changes.
The attached presentation is a summary of their work.
The attached presentation is a summary of their work.
Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
Scope 1 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Stationary combustion | 3,783 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) | 275 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
4,058
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 2 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Imported electricity | 3,000 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Imported thermal energy | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
3,000
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
GHG emissions from biomass combustion
0
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 3 GHG emissions
Yes or No | Weight in MTCO2e | |
Business travel | Yes | 300 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Commuting | Yes | 727 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Purchased goods and services | Yes | 23 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Capital goods | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Waste generated in operations | Yes | 293 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources | --- | 659 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
2,002
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:
Employee Commuting: used a survey plus pro-rated the amount for spring 2020 when employees worked remotely.
Business Travel: credit card receipts from the business office on flights with our accounting codes.
Purchased Goods: Paper
Waste: all solid municipal and construction waste produced on campus.
Other Sources: Study Abroad Air Travel, Scope 2 Transmission & Distribution Losses, and Wastewater.
Business Travel: credit card receipts from the business office on flights with our accounting codes.
Purchased Goods: Paper
Waste: all solid municipal and construction waste produced on campus.
Other Sources: Study Abroad Air Travel, Scope 2 Transmission & Distribution Losses, and Wastewater.
Part 2. Air pollutant emissions inventory
Yes
Annual weight of emissions for::
Weight of Emissions | |
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | 8.34 Tons |
Sulfur oxides (SOx) | 0.18 Tons |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | 5.46 Tons |
Particulate matter (PM) | --- |
Ozone (O3) | --- |
Lead (Pb) | --- |
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | --- |
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | --- |
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | 0.50 Tons |
Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
Yes or No | |
Major stationary sources | Yes |
Area sources | No |
Mobile sources | Yes |
Commuting | Yes |
Off-site electricity production | Yes |
None
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
The Carleton College maintenance department submits how much fuel we burn and contracts with a third-party company to test stack emissions to determine the efficiency of our burn. This company produces an air emissions inventory for use by the college. This data varies depending on the weather but our operations have not changed.
Optional Fields
3,000
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
0
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.