| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 55.02 |
| Liaison | Rob Williams |
| Submission Date | July 2, 2024 |
Capilano University
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Rob
Williams Project Manager Facilities |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Devon Miller, Principal and Founder
Origin Sustainable Design and Planning
External Consultant.
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Prior to performing the External Assurance Audit, the CAPU STARS team performed it's own internal review of the report utilizing the '2.2 Review Template'. This was completed for due dilligence and to ensure conformance to the STARS requirements. As it was completed by the CAPU team directly responsible for the STARS submission, it has not been included as an Internal Assurance Audit.
The External audit was then completed as follows utilizing the 2.2 Review Template:
- CAPU shared DRAFT submission with Origin Sustainable Design and Planning (OSDP)
- OSDP performed 1st review, categorizing credits and suggestions as applicable.
- Workshop held to review comments with CAPU
- CAPU internal coordination of responses and 'Institution Response: 1st Review update'
- OSDP performed 2nd Review to confirm all initial suggestions had been addressed. Document was updated and reissued to CAPU with statement of affirmation.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The attached Excel includes both 1st and 2nd Review.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.