| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 52.75 |
| Liaison | Jennifer Daniels |
| Submission Date | May 28, 2020 |
California State University, Stanislaus
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Wendy
Olmstead Sustainability Coordinator Capital Planning & Facilities Management |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Internal Review by a sub-group of the Council for Sustainable Futures:
Dr. Julia Sankey, Faculty Fellow
Dr. David Colnic, Faculty Fellow
Cynella Aghasi, Sustainability Director for Associated Students Inc.
External Review: Ryan Todd, Sustainability Manager, and Kristen Wonder, Waste and Sustainability Coordinator, California State University Sacramento
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Members of the Council for Sustainable Futures reviewed the entire STARS report during in-person and Zoom meetings and identified areas for additional information and improvement. University responses and detailed information regarding corrections were added to the review spreadsheet and provided to the internal review team to confirm that all inconsistencies and errors were successfully addressed.
Ryan Todd, Ryan Todd, Sustainability Manager, and Kristen Wonder, Waste and Sustainability Coordinator of California State University Sacramento conducted an external review and provided the review spreadsheet via email for correction, clarification, and additional information. University responses and detailed information regarding corrections were added to the review spreadsheet and provided to the external review team to confirm that all inconsistencies and errors were successfully addressed.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.