| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 67.35 |
| Liaison | Juliana Goodlaw-Morris |
| Submission Date | Feb. 6, 2024 |
California State University, San Marcos
OP-4: Building Operations and Maintenance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
2.00 / 5.00 |
Floyd
Dudley II Director Facility Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total floor area of existing building space:
1,940,425
Square feet
Floor area of existing building space operated and maintained in accordance with a sustainable management policy/program and/or a green building rating system:
| Existing floor area | |
| Certified at the highest achievable level under a multi-attribute, Green Building Council (GBC) rating system focused on the operations and maintenance of existing buildings (e.g., LEED O+M Platinum) | 0 Square feet |
| Certified at the 2nd highest level under a 4- or 5-tier, multi-attribute, GBC rating system focused on the operations and maintenance of existing buildings (e.g., LEED O+M Gold) | 0 Square feet |
| Certified at mid-level under a 3- or 5-tier, multi-attribute, GBC rating system focused on the operations and maintenance of existing buildings (e.g., BREEAM-In Use Very Good) | 0 Square feet |
| Certified at a step above minimum level under a 4 -or 5–tier, multi-attribute, GBC rating system focused on the operations and maintenance of existing buildings (e.g., LEED O+M Silver) | 0 Square feet |
| Certified at minimum level under a multi-attribute, GBC rating system focused on the operations and maintenance of existing buildings (e.g., BREEAM In-Use Pass or LEED O+M Certified) | 0 Square feet |
| Certified at any level under a non-GBC rating system or single-attribute rating system focused on the operations and maintenance of existing buildings | 0 Square feet |
| Operated and maintained in accordance with a multi-attribute, sustainable management policy/program, but not certified under an O+M rating system | 1,940,425 Square feet |
| Operated and maintained in accordance with a single-attribute, sustainable management policy/program, but not certified under an O+M rating system | 0 Square feet |
| Total | 1,940,425 Square feet |
Percentage of existing building space certified under a green building rating system rating system focused on the operations and maintenance of existing buildings:
0
A brief description of the sustainable operations and maintenance policy/program and/or O+M rating system(s) used:
CSUSM operates and maintains all buildings with a keen focus on energy efficiency, water conservation, indoor environmental quality, and responsible waste management. Additionally, the university follows Executive Order 987 from the California State University Chancellor's Office that establishes guidelines for operating and maintaining existing buildings to be efficient, healthy spaces for all learners.
Sustainable Building Practices:
Existing building energy performance will be optimized through improved operation, maintenance and repair, and capital improvement, enabling campuses to meet carbon reduction goals. Sustainable design for capital projects is a process of balancing long-term institutional needs for academic and related programs with environmental concerns. In the context of designing to provide for university and academic needs, the following attributes will be considered "sustainable:"
Siting and design considerations that optimize local geographic features to improve sustainability of the project, such as proximity to public transportation and maximizing use of vistas, microclimate, and prevailing winds;
Durable systems and finishes with long life cycles that minimize maintenance and replacement.
Optimization of layouts and designing spaces that can be reconfigured with the expectation that the facility will be renovated and re-used (versus demolished);
Systems designed for optimization of energy, water, and other natural resources;
Optimization of indoor environmental quality for occupants;
Utilization of environmentally preferable products and processes, such as long life-cycle materials and components, recycled-content and recyclable materials;
Procedures that monitor, trend, and report operational performance as compared to the optimal design and operating parameters.
Cost-effective design features which algin with CSU Basic Needs Initiative and support campus diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. (04-Adopt; 14-Move, 22-Return & Revise)
Sustainable Building Practices:
Existing building energy performance will be optimized through improved operation, maintenance and repair, and capital improvement, enabling campuses to meet carbon reduction goals. Sustainable design for capital projects is a process of balancing long-term institutional needs for academic and related programs with environmental concerns. In the context of designing to provide for university and academic needs, the following attributes will be considered "sustainable:"
Siting and design considerations that optimize local geographic features to improve sustainability of the project, such as proximity to public transportation and maximizing use of vistas, microclimate, and prevailing winds;
Durable systems and finishes with long life cycles that minimize maintenance and replacement.
Optimization of layouts and designing spaces that can be reconfigured with the expectation that the facility will be renovated and re-used (versus demolished);
Systems designed for optimization of energy, water, and other natural resources;
Optimization of indoor environmental quality for occupants;
Utilization of environmentally preferable products and processes, such as long life-cycle materials and components, recycled-content and recyclable materials;
Procedures that monitor, trend, and report operational performance as compared to the optimal design and operating parameters.
Cost-effective design features which algin with CSU Basic Needs Initiative and support campus diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. (04-Adopt; 14-Move, 22-Return & Revise)
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.