Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 56.14 |
Liaison | Miguel Martin |
Submission Date | Aug. 26, 2022 |
California State University, San Bernardino
OP-10: Biodiversity
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
2.00 / 2.00 |
Miguel
Martin Energy and Sustainability Manager Facilities Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Does the institution own or manage land that includes or is adjacent to legally protected areas, internationally recognized areas, priority sites for biodiversity, or regions of conservation importance?:
Yes
A brief description of the legally protected areas, internationally recognized areas, priority sites for biodiversity, and/or regions of conservation importance:
The CSU San Bernardino campus is adjacent to the San Bernardino National Forest, a public conservation area with over 150,000 acres of wildlands, 71 legally threatened, endangered and sensitive animal and 85 plant species.
Endangered and vulnerable species
Yes
A list of endangered and vulnerable species with habitats on land owned or managed by the institution, by level of extinction risk:
the survival of key listed species such as endangered
Southern California steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii), and threatened arroyo toad (Bufo californicus). Monitoring the physical, chemical and biological parameters of streams on the LPNF informs the management and protection of these vulnerable communities and natural resources.
Southern California steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii), and threatened arroyo toad (Bufo californicus). Monitoring the physical, chemical and biological parameters of streams on the LPNF informs the management and protection of these vulnerable communities and natural resources.
Areas of biodiversity importance
Yes
A brief description of areas of biodiversity importance on land owned or managed by the institution:
Species include San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, California Gnatcatcher, Parry's Spineflower, and the San Diego Horned Lizard.
Methodologies
If yes to either of the above, provide the following:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the U. S. Department of Fish and Wildlife Service, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the Campus Master Plan and subsequent special studies to comply with mitigation measures. Biologists performed trapping and survey methods for verification of the presence of the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, as well as nesting and migratory bird monitoring.
A brief description of the scope of the assessment(s):
the work was performed in the field and conducted as follows: The teams began work at the bottom of each stream reach and sampled upstream to avoid
disturbing the biota and substrata and continued to the top of the reach. Pin flags were placed every 10 m and water depth, sediment depth, wetted width, canopy cover, substrate
classification, current speed, and presence/absence of trout collected recorded every 10 m over the 100 m reach. Photo-documentation, GPS coordinates (i.e, latitude and longitude), and multimeter readings (i.e., dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, conductivity and specific conductance) were taken at 0 m and 100 m. Other readings included slope, habitat observations, and pool-riffle
ratios.
disturbing the biota and substrata and continued to the top of the reach. Pin flags were placed every 10 m and water depth, sediment depth, wetted width, canopy cover, substrate
classification, current speed, and presence/absence of trout collected recorded every 10 m over the 100 m reach. Photo-documentation, GPS coordinates (i.e, latitude and longitude), and multimeter readings (i.e., dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, conductivity and specific conductance) were taken at 0 m and 100 m. Other readings included slope, habitat observations, and pool-riffle
ratios.
A brief description of the plans or programs in place to protect or positively affect identified species, habitats, and/or ecosystems:
Restrictive signage has been posted in sensitive areas.
Optional Fields
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s biodiversity initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.