Overall Rating Silver
Overall Score 51.18
Liaison Miguel Martin
Submission Date March 5, 2021

STARS v2.2

California State University, San Bernardino
PA-6: Assessing Diversity and Equity

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 1.00 Miguel Martin
Energy and Sustainability Manager
Facilities Management
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Has the institution engaged in a structured assessment process during the previous three years to improve diversity, equity and inclusion on campus?:
Yes

A brief description of the assessment process and the framework, scorecard(s) and/or tool(s) used:

INPUTS OUTPUTS OUTCOMES MEASURES IMPACT
Full-time faculty WI
Coordinator
WI Program budget
Antiracist writing
pedagogy resources
Writing-Enriched
Curriculum
program (WEC)
Faculty learning
communities
Workshops and
Webinars
Coaching/mentor
ing/1:1
consultation
1. Faculty
implement
antiracist
teaching and/or
assessment
strategy in a
WI/WEC course
2. Students will
write in their
discipline
effectively
1. Review of WI/WEC
course syllabi; Track
faculty participation
in antiracist teaching
and assessment
learning experiences;
survey faculty and
students
2. Review of
symposium
submissions of
student work;
portfolio review;
survey students and
faculty
Learning
Scholarship
Commitment to
diversity, equity,
and inclusiveness
Supportive and
engaging
environments


Does the assessment process address campus climate by engaging stakeholders to assess the attitudes, perceptions and behaviors of employees and students, including the experiences of underrepresented groups?:
Yes

Does the assessment process address student outcomes related to diversity, equity and success?:
Yes

Does the assessment process address employee outcomes related to diversity and equity?:
Yes

A brief description of the most recent assessment findings and how the results are used in shaping policy, programs, and initiatives:

The most recent assessment results assisted in shaping policy because the results of the qualitative portions indicated what the campus community wanted to see more of and how their experience is/was affected by the current policies. As a result, our campus expanded the diversity office and enhanced university policy on program standards and resources for all CSUSB affiliates.


Are the results of the most recent structured diversity and equity assessment shared with the campus community?:
Yes

A brief description of how the assessment results are shared with the campus community:

Assessment results were shared with the campus community via email and available on the campus website.


Are the results (or a summary of the results) of the most recent structured diversity and equity assessment publicly posted?:
Yes

The diversity and equity assessment report or summary (upload):
Website URL where the diversity and equity assessment report or summary is publicly posted:
Website URL where information about the institution’s diversity and equity assessment efforts is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.