Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 51.18 |
Liaison | Miguel Martin |
Submission Date | March 5, 2021 |
California State University, San Bernardino
OP-21: Water Use
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.26 / 5.00 |
Miguel
Martin Energy and Sustainability Manager Facilities Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Level of ”Physical Risk Quantity” for the institution’s main campus as indicated by the World Resources Institute Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas:
Medium to High
Part 1. Reduction in potable water use per person
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total water withdrawal | 284,946,453 Gallons | 284,946,453 Gallons |
Potable water use:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use | 281,985,199.74 Gallons | 281,985,199.74 Gallons |
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Period | July 1, 2019 | June 30, 2020 |
Baseline Period | July 1, 2019 | June 30, 2020 |
If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:
Fiscal Year 2006-07 was the last full fiscal year before aggressive water conservation measures were implemented, such as automated weather-based irrigation controls and domestic water fixture retrofits to low-flow units. Irrigation well to supply roughly 40% of irrigation supply on main San Bernardino campus was also in operation effective November 2007. The year is used as a baseline to measure our improvement and performance with longitudinal research to identify trends and water behavior patterns.
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users":
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 1,343 | 1,294 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 4 | 9 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site | 0 | 0 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 19,404 | 50,728 |
Full-time equivalent of employees | 1,516 | 1,752 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 950 | 329 |
Weighted campus users | 15,314.25 | 39,439 |
Potable water use per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use per weighted campus user | 18,413.26 Gallons | 7,149.91 Gallons |
Percentage reduction in potable water use per weighted campus user from baseline:
0
Part 2. Reduction in potable water use per unit of floor area
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Gross floor area | 2,766,162 Gross square feet | 2,139,699 Gross square feet |
Potable water use per unit of floor area:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use per unit of floor area | 101.94 Gallons per square foot | 131.79 Gallons per square foot |
Percentage reduction in potable water use per unit of floor area from baseline:
22.65
Part 3. Reduction in total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Vegetated grounds | 0 Acres | 0 Acres |
Total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds | 284,946,453 Gallons per acre | 284,946,453 Gallons per acre |
Percentage reduction in total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds from baseline:
0
Optional Fields
CSU Executive Order 987 (2006), Section V.3.19. mandates that "all CSU campuses will take every necessary step to conserve water resources, including such steps as installing controls to optimize irrigation water, reducing water usage in restrooms and showers, and promoting the use of reclaimed water. The use of decorative fountains should be minimized. In the event of a declaration of drought, the CSU will cooperate with the state, city, and county governments to the greatest extent possible to effect additional water conservation."
A brief description of the institution's water recovery and reuse initiatives:
None.
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace plumbing fixtures, fittings, appliances, equipment, and systems with water-efficient alternatives:
All domestic water fixtures, including sink faucets, shower heads, urinals, and toilets on both campuses have either been constructed as or now retrofit to low-flow units. State and some non-State buildings have automated motion sensors on sink faucets installed to minimize water waste while soaping and from unoccupied faucets left running.
Website URL where information about the institution’s water conservation and efficiency efforts is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.