| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 66.84 |
| Liaison | Stephanie Del Rosario |
| Submission Date | May 26, 2022 |
California State University, Fullerton
OP-16: Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.83 / 5.00 |
Kristen
Jasko Associate Director Parking and Transportation |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
Full-time equivalent of employees:
Has the institution gathered data about student commuting behavior?:
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
The student data was obtained through permit sales, transit pass sales, and students with no permit. The percentage of estimated student cyclists, walkers, and train riders based on the percentage of actual employee walkers & train riders.
The timeframe for the data and analysis was taken from Fall 2019.
Has the institution gathered data about employee commuting behavior?:
Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
Employee data obtained through permit sales, transit pass sales, and the Commuter Choice Program registration.
The timeframe for the data and analysis is Fall 2019.
Percentage of students and employees that use the following as their primary mode of transportation:
| Percentage of students (0-100) | Percentage of employees (0-100) | |
| Single-occupancy vehicle | 79.38 | 75.69 |
| Zero-emissions vehicle | 0.38 | 4.41 |
| Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode | 6.28 | 1.31 |
| Vanpool or carpool | 0.63 | 4.02 |
| Public transport or campus shuttle | 8.55 | 12.18 |
| Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped | 4.22 | 2.01 |
| Distance education / telecommute | 0.57 | 0.39 |
Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.