| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 57.31 |
| Liaison | Feng Teter |
| Submission Date | Dec. 4, 2023 |
California State University, Fresno
OP-16: Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.23 / 5.00 |
Blake
Avant Engineering and Energy Services Facilities Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
20,692
Full-time equivalent of employees:
1,738
Part 1. Student commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
4.60
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
Number of students enrolled in carpool program = total number of students carpooling
(Number of students who swipe their ID card when riding City of Fresno buses) + (number of students riding V-line buses) = total number of students riding buses
Number of students who have registered their bike = number of students biking
[Total number of students carpooling (306) + number of students riding buses (589) + number of students biking (57)] divided by [the total number of enrolled students (20,692)]= reported 4.6% of students using sustainable commuting options
These numbers were collected from our Parking & Transportation Manager, therefore we consider this analysis to be representative of the student population. The timeframe for this analysis was one academic year (2022-2023).
(Number of students who swipe their ID card when riding City of Fresno buses) + (number of students riding V-line buses) = total number of students riding buses
Number of students who have registered their bike = number of students biking
[Total number of students carpooling (306) + number of students riding buses (589) + number of students biking (57)] divided by [the total number of enrolled students (20,692)]= reported 4.6% of students using sustainable commuting options
These numbers were collected from our Parking & Transportation Manager, therefore we consider this analysis to be representative of the student population. The timeframe for this analysis was one academic year (2022-2023).
Part 2. Employee commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
4.10
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
Number of employees enrolled in carpool program = total number of employees carpooling
[Total number of employees carpooling (71) divided by [the total number of employees (1,738)]= reported 4.1% of employees using sustainable commuting options
These numbers were collected from our Parking & Transportation Manager, therefore we consider this analysis to be representative of the employee population. The timeframe for this analysis was one academic year (2022-2023).
[Total number of employees carpooling (71) divided by [the total number of employees (1,738)]= reported 4.1% of employees using sustainable commuting options
These numbers were collected from our Parking & Transportation Manager, therefore we consider this analysis to be representative of the employee population. The timeframe for this analysis was one academic year (2022-2023).
Optional Fields
| Percentage of students (0-100) | Percentage of employees (0-100) | |
| Single-occupancy vehicle | 55.30 | 40 |
| Zero-emissions vehicle | --- | --- |
| Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode | 0.30 | --- |
| Vanpool or carpool | 1.50 | 4.10 |
| Public transport or campus shuttle | 2.80 | --- |
| Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped | 0.30 | --- |
| Distance education / telecommute | --- | --- |
Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.