Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 42.65 |
Liaison | Winnie Kwofie |
Submission Date | April 19, 2019 |
Executive Letter | Download |
California State University, East Bay
IN-24: Innovation A
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Donna
Placzek Director Environmental Health & Safety Environmental Health and Safety |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Name or title of the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome:
Smoke-Free Campus
A brief description of the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome that outlines how credit criteria are met and any positive measurable outcomes associated with the innovation:
A cornerstone of the California State University and higher education is the principle of one’s individual freedom to learn, teach, work, think, and take part in their intellectual and career endeavors in a fulfilling, rewarding, safe, and healthy environment.
For decades, the health hazards of tobacco and second-hand smoke to individuals have been well studied and chronicled.
Further, studies have clearly demonstrated the acute health benefits, medical costs savings, and organizational costs savings when individuals quit smoking.
Thus, in order to provide the California State University’s faculty, staff, students, guests and the public with campuses that support the principle of one’s individual freedom to learn, teach, work, think and take part in their intellectual endeavors in a fulfilling, rewarding, safe and healthy environment, the creation and implementation of a “smoke and tobacco free” policy systemwide is necessary and welcome.
Campus Presidents or their designees shall have the responsibility for implementing the policy on their campuses with an implementation date of September 1, 2017.
Which of the following impact areas does the innovation most closely relate to? (select up to three):
Wellbeing & Work
Optional Fields
---
None
The website URL where information about the innovation is available :
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.