Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 65.23 |
Liaison | Roxane Beigel-Coryell |
Submission Date | March 6, 2020 |
California State University, Channel Islands
PA-10: Sustainable Investment
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.75 / 3.00 |
Richard
LeRoy Senior Director of University Development University Development |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Positive sustainability investment
23,830,749
US/Canadian $
Value of holdings in each of the following categories:
Value of holdings | |
Sustainable industries (e.g., renewable energy or sustainable forestry) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g., using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Sustainability investment funds (e.g., a renewable energy or impact investment fund) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or the equivalent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens (or the equivalent) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Green revolving funds funded from the endowment | 0 US/Canadian $ |
If any of the above is greater than zero, provide:
---
Percentage of the institution's investment pool in positive sustainability investments:
0
Part 2. Investor engagement
Sustainable investment policy
Yes
None
A copy of the sustainable investment policy:
None
The sustainable investment policy:
---
None
Does the institution use its sustainable investment policy to select and guide investment managers?:
Yes
A brief description of how the sustainable investment policy is applied:
The CSUCI Foundation recently started to transition to a new investment management firm. The investment managers use the investment policy to screen potential investments.
Proxy voting
No
None
A copy of the proxy voting guidelines or proxy record:
---
None
A brief description of how managers are adhering to proxy voting guidelines:
Proxy voting is not permissible per the CSUCI Foundation bylaws.
Shareholder resolutions
No
Examples of how the institution has engaged with corporations in its portfolio about sustainability issues during the previous three years:
The Finance & Investment Committee has asked fund managers to provide information on screening tactics and various tilts.
Divestment efforts and negative screens
Yes
A brief description of the divestment effort or negative screens and how they have been implemented:
The Foundation has negative screens for fossil fuels, tobacco, and civilian firearms. Where possible, the investment managers have been instructed to avoid these investments.
Approximate percentage of endowment that the divestment effort and/or negative screens apply to:
68
Investor networks
No
None
A brief description of the investor networks and/or collaborations:
---
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.