Overall Rating Gold - expired
Overall Score 65.23
Liaison Roxane Beigel-Coryell
Submission Date March 6, 2020

STARS v2.2

California State University, Channel Islands
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.56 / 3.00 Roxane Beigel-Coryell
Sustainability & Energy Manager
Facilities Services
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Has the institution conducted a GHG emissions inventory within the previous three years that includes all Scope 1 and 2 emissions? :
Yes

A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:

To conduct the GHG inventory, CSUCI used the Sustainability Indicator Management & Analysis Platform (SIMAP) developed by the University of New Hampshire Sustainability Institute.


Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
No

A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
---

Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
---

Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
Weight in MTCO2e
Stationary combustion 402.79 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) 205.72 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
608.51 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year (market-based):
Weight in MTCO2e
Imported electricity 4,178.49 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Imported thermal energy 3,947 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
8,125.49 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Gross GHG emissions from biogenic sources, performance year:
0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Does the GHG emissions inventory include Scope 3 emissions from the following sources?:
Yes or No Weight in MTCO2e
Business travel No ---
Commuting Yes 6,897.21 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Purchased goods and services No ---
Capital goods No ---
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 Yes 184.56 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Waste generated in operations Yes 122.56 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Other sources No 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
7,204.33 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:

To account for waste emissions in Scope 3, we used available waste disposal data from the university's waste hauler. To account for commuting-related emissions, the university used data from an annual commuter survey that is sent to all employees and student employees to gather information on how individuals travel to campus, how far they travel, and how often they travel, on a weekly basis. Finally, we included transportation and distribution losses in our Scope 3 emissions.


Has the institution completed an inventory within the previous three years to quantify its air pollutant emissions?:
No

Annual weight of emissions for::
Weight of Emissions
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) 0 Tons
Sulfur oxides (SOx) 0 Tons
Carbon monoxide (CO) 0 Tons
Particulate matter (PM) 0 Tons
Ozone (O3) 0 Tons
Lead (Pb) 0 Tons
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) 0 Tons
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) 0 Tons
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations 0 Tons

Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
Yes or No
Major stationary sources No
Area sources No
Mobile sources No
Commuting No
Off-site electricity production No

A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
---

Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from purchased electricity (location-based):
2,744.59 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
3,947 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.