Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 65.23 |
Liaison | Roxane Beigel-Coryell |
Submission Date | March 6, 2020 |
California State University, Channel Islands
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.56 / 3.00 |
Roxane
Beigel-Coryell Sustainability & Energy Manager Facilities Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Greenhouse gas emissions inventory
Yes
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:
To conduct the GHG inventory, CSUCI used the Sustainability Indicator Management & Analysis Platform (SIMAP) developed by the University of New Hampshire Sustainability Institute.
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
No
A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
---
Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
---
Scope 1 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Stationary combustion | 402.79 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) | 205.72 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
608.51
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 2 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Imported electricity | 4,178.49 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Imported thermal energy | 3,947 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
8,125.49
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
GHG emissions from biomass combustion
0
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 3 GHG emissions
Yes or No | Weight in MTCO2e | |
Business travel | No | --- |
Commuting | Yes | 6,897.21 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Purchased goods and services | No | --- |
Capital goods | No | --- |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | Yes | 184.56 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Waste generated in operations | Yes | 122.56 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
7,204.33
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:
To account for waste emissions in Scope 3, we used available waste disposal data from the university's waste hauler. To account for commuting-related emissions, the university used data from an annual commuter survey that is sent to all employees and student employees to gather information on how individuals travel to campus, how far they travel, and how often they travel, on a weekly basis. Finally, we included transportation and distribution losses in our Scope 3 emissions.
Part 2. Air pollutant emissions inventory
No
Annual weight of emissions for::
Weight of Emissions | |
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | 0 Tons |
Sulfur oxides (SOx) | 0 Tons |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | 0 Tons |
Particulate matter (PM) | 0 Tons |
Ozone (O3) | 0 Tons |
Lead (Pb) | 0 Tons |
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | 0 Tons |
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | 0 Tons |
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | 0 Tons |
Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
Yes or No | |
Major stationary sources | No |
Area sources | No |
Mobile sources | No |
Commuting | No |
Off-site electricity production | No |
None
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
---
Optional Fields
2,744.59
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
3,947
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.